Model Boat Mayhem

The Shipyard ( Dry Dock ): Builds & Questions => Navy - Military - Battleships: => Topic started by: garston1 on November 12, 2010, 06:29:04 pm

Title: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: garston1 on November 12, 2010, 06:29:04 pm
I took some photo's of Prince Charles old ship BRONNINGTON today at a cut in Birkenhead docks. It looks like she might be coming to the end of her life
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: Martin (Admin) on November 12, 2010, 06:47:28 pm
What type of ship was/is she/
 What where duties, role did she play?
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: sailorboy61 on November 12, 2010, 06:50:39 pm
Ah, seen here a few times while working over at T&L, hadn't realised it was the Bronnington.
Certainly looking past her best!!
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: garston1 on November 12, 2010, 06:55:35 pm
Hiya Martin, she is a Ton Class Minesweeper, launched in 1953
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: chingdevil on November 12, 2010, 06:55:42 pm
Was she not a minesweeper in her former life, did she not have a wooden hull??


Brian
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: garston1 on November 12, 2010, 07:01:45 pm
Yes Brian, her hull is Mahogany!
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: chingdevil on November 12, 2010, 07:04:50 pm
Thought so, she was fitted with twin Paxman Deltic diesel engines.

Brian
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: Jimmy James on November 12, 2010, 07:32:07 pm
Yes The Blo---y Paxman's ....Min Speed 6 to 6.5 kts ---@#*%!#---  Trying to get into small or awkward harbours was a nightmare. Many a Pilot has had brown trousers the first time he brought one of them into port ---others allways used tugs
Freebooter
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: garston1 on November 12, 2010, 07:45:23 pm
A photo of the engines
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: farrow on November 12, 2010, 10:13:35 pm
The comment on min speeds reminds of the RMAS Arrochar, single screw with min 9.5 knots and when gear engaged 11.5 knots for 30 secs. Tugs where available only in British Naval Bases, plus you never let pilots have ago unless you wanted a emergency docking.
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: Jimmy James on November 13, 2010, 06:55:23 pm
We Had a fly boy In charge (No Names --It was his first command Gave us all grey hair we were hopeing he would back to commanding Vampires)
 Freebooter
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: pugwash on November 13, 2010, 08:41:13 pm
Yes they are a menace these ex-pilot skippers, on JUNO ours was an ex-Phantom  pilot and only knew full ahead,
unfortunately he went full astern into the jetty at Piraeus in front of a NATO fleet (ask Bryan Young he was there)
Still it did give us two weeks in Malta getting the prop and rudder repaired.
Geoff
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: adam_goodin on November 17, 2010, 08:45:46 am
Hi all.... been away for about a month now, without the internet...or boats!!! nightmare haha (another story!)

 However, at present, don't worry about the Bronington  :-)) Have a little faith and you may just see her back on the big wet stuff.

All the best Guys and Girls,
 Adam.
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: Netleyned on November 17, 2010, 10:18:25 am
At last!
Someone who can spell Bronington correctly.
She was built as a minesweeper but converted to
a Minehunter in the early 60's


Ned
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: sweeper on November 17, 2010, 12:27:19 pm
For general info.
The early versions of the Tons were engined with Mirrlees plant (2500 HP), had open bridges and lattice masts. The later ones had Napier Deltic plant (3000HP), enclosed bridges and tripod masts. Over a period of time the originals were converted to the later design to conform with the N.B.C. concept of operation (running the ship completely closed off from the outside world).

Anyone with a sad sense of humour would welcome the chance to work on / remove the space heaters fitted to the main engines and pulse generator. A dirty job as they were diesel fuelled (electric ignition), run on a timer clock and ended up coated with solid black crap. Working under the engines was a real treat. :((
Ohh  happy days!!!
Sad to see the old ship in that nick though. 
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: adam_goodin on November 19, 2010, 10:47:35 am
I was on board her last year when she was in dock with the Plymouth. And, although people will say different, a lot of the wear and tare is mostly cosmetic. Her Deck needs replacing though, and unfortunately has leaked, which in turn has ruined a lot of the fittings/furniture below decks.

 But, she isn't to bad considering how she was left, and isn't up for scrap  :-)) Trust me.

Her fuel tanks are removed and a large piece of bulkhead missing Aft, where she was converted to hold a function room. Steering gear, or what is left...isn't in a serviceable condition, but, with parts could be re-vamped.

 Don't be to concerned, as I said before, HMS Bronington may just get back out on the big wet stuff yet. ok2
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: Martin (Admin) on November 19, 2010, 07:12:05 pm
Topic renamed... respelt!   ok2
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: garston1 on November 19, 2010, 07:17:23 pm
cheers Martin, just a slip of the 'N's.
Title: Re: HMS BRONINGTON
Post by: FishHead on September 07, 2012, 05:06:03 pm
Yes they are a menace these ex-pilot skippers, on JUNO ours was an ex-Phantom  pilot and only knew full ahead,
unfortunately he went full astern into the jetty at Piraeus in front of a NATO fleet (ask Bryan Young he was there)
Still it did give us two weeks in Malta getting the prop and rudder repaired.
Geoff
Yup, we had one on the TARTAR. His first attempt at going alongside the wooden fuelling jetty in Freetown was interesting. I think he was expecting an arrestor wire. Didn't half make the old jetty squeal!