If a capacitor is placed in front of the coil, it funnels most/some of the AC to 'ground' before it can get to the coil. That's good. Then, if you put a capacitor on the back side of the coil (going from + to - like the one in front), even more of the AC is funneled (shunted) to ground.
I'm hearing you, Doc. From what I could glean from the image I get the idea it's like this (see att.). Two windings on a single toroid.
But bear in mind I used the term 'transformer' loosely (we're talking DC). Inductance, wire gauge, etc. is fascinating stuff. And the day when I discover how to shove DC up a trnsfrm and get loads of DC out... Thing is, I was wondering what would happen when a spike hits, say, the pos. rail. By virtue of the induced back EMF into the neg. coil when said voltage spike dies - (because BOTH windings are on the same toroid) - then surely the unwanted spike landing on the OTHER rail means double trouble?
By the by...
Doc is a neat handle. What's the story? Doc Halliday, perchance?
Daryl:
It's just a matter of time 'afore you hear the words thread and hijack. Yeah - I know, I know. Sorry, amigo.
Wombat:
Ah, right! I'm hearing you, too. So you call it common-mode signal. But I'm still confused. You say the induced flux cancels the (reciprocating) currents. Agreed... to an extent. But wouldn't you say that winding the coil in each rail on a separate toroid would totally illiminate unwanted induced flux?
I'm still running on an L plate, don't forget.
BTW, you say Ken-T's unwanted sinewave is probably due to the inductance ringing with the suppression caps'. But what caps?... the one's, presumably, on his motor?... ESC?... Where?
Yep - I've got that stiff drink in me paw.
Hit me....