Okay, so lets bring it back to life again with a couple fo statements:
- Jellico knew that the underwater protection of his early dreadnoughts was not as good as it could be.
- The loss of Audatious shows how effective a mine can be if it goes off in the wrong(right) place
- Prewar battle practice showed that if a fleet in a long line was attacked on mass with torpedoes, even from long range, by probability something like 30% of ships would be hit because they all sailed in a long line close together to maximise firepower. This was known as a "browning attack". As it happens this was exposed to be overly pesimistic but why take a chance.
- The Germans had the same problem but figued if the worst thing possible happened and they fell under the massed guns of the Grand Fleet having crossed their "T" they should practice a battle turnaway - basically the last ship in the line does 180 degree turn followed immediatley by the next in line and so forth. To cover this withdrawl (run away) they planned to used mass torpedo attacks which is exacltly what Jellico feared.
- Why take the chance, turn away, minimise damage and finish the fight tomorrow.
- The reality is Hipper outfought Beatty (I seem to recall that Beatty chaged course just before the action which threw all the gunnery solutions and that the greater range of guns of the his battlecrusiers was not therefore explouited and the Germans actually opened fire first.
- However we need to reflect that whilst Hipper outfought Beattty, Beatty tactically outfought Hipper by leading his battlecrusiers into the guns of the Grand Fleet. The slight speed advantage ofthe british ships forced Hipper back on the HSF thus denying intelligence to Sheer.
- Sheer blundered obliviously into the guns of the GF. Whilst suffering unaceptable losses (due poor amunition handling) the british battlecrusiers tactically did exactly what they intended to do! So Jellico outfought Sheer, twice!
Let the debate continue!
G