Just to add to the mix. Dreadnought, the real one, on full power trials (9th October 1906):
SHP = 24712 (18.4 MW)
Speed = 21.05 knots
Coal Consumption = 16.66 T/hr (139 MW @ 30 MJ/kg)
Steam Consumption = 15.3 lbs/shp/hr
The coal-burning Dreadnought was therefore about 13% efficient in terms of turning the energy available in coal into motion. The model will be less efficient again - smaller props, different Reynolds Numbers, smaller diameter turbines - the list is long. The only advantage you might have is by using propane/butane: it has 150% of the energy by weight of coal.
If you needed (say) 100W at the prop end for a scale-like 3.5 fps, at 13% you'd be needing at least 770W and presumably a lot more (2kW? 5kW?) at the burner end. It's heading from kettle to house boiler territory.
Is this do-able? What sort of watt outputs can you get in model boilers?
Andy