OK Danielle....we see you are now using
radial spacing for the replacement bow frames..."
just like the real thing"
We see the difference in Frames 35......it appears that the presentation of the original Frame has been take in plain End Elevation view without considering that the actual frame is positioned in a radial placement....
The only way to see a true profile of that Frame would have been to view it in End Elevation, but
offset by the same angleIf we go one step further back, it certainly could have been that when the original plans were converted or manipulated in the software
NaviCad? or DelftShip, that these bow Frames were not marked as from radial placement etc ...
The software can only provide and print out a Frame profile as to the dimensions provided by the person entering these ....so this does explain the human error or misunderstanding
As frustrating as it can be, the only important point is that now you know the hull will be correct
....
Derek
BTW.....frames in radial placement offer far greater strength [against the force of water] than frames in angular/straight placement