I was thinking of NMs comment above.
Re: more queries!!!!
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2009, 01:37:50 AM »
Reply with quote
Twin poker burners would be fine and so would twin ceramic burners but in my ever so humble opinion if you have to use two burners to heat something up then my guess would be something else might be designed poorly. Inocent
For example: the standard practice for most marine boiler makers when designing and building a larger diameter boiler is to use a heavier gauge copper tube etc, etc, etc.
UNQUOTE!
Did anyone notice that motor car engines now have lots of smaller diameter valves, to get the gas flow happening better than the old "Two Huge Valves"?
Goodness knows how many valves the Grand Prix engines now have. Is this not a matter of "Gas Flow"
I have made a few boilers in my lil' old workshop, quite a few. I also have made lots of burners, poker type, ceramic, you name it.
I do not have the skill to produce a (fantastic looking outfit), as does Mr Hemmens, Mr Monahan, Messrs Stuart et al. As it happens my toys work very well, but they don't look like the professionals' work.
The two smaller burners, have worked better for me, in larger boilers, rather than the one big one.
My opinion only.
I know someone will shoot me down, but, that's life, is it not?
Neil.
