This is a complex box of possibilities

....[all looking on the propeller from the stern]
1. if we consider the
Stdb clockwise propeller as tightened up against a propeller shaft shoulder [with a left hand thread] it is the same as torqueing a nut to a bolt
2. the clockwise rotation of the propeller shaft against the set of the propeller maintains the mechanical integrity from the initial torque applied, as the forces on the propeller blades aid to maintain the applied torque
3. if we consider the
Port anticlockwise propeller as tightened up against a propeller shaft shoulder [with a right hand thread] it is the same as torqueing a nut to a bolt
4. the anticlockwise rotation of the propeller shaft against the set of the propeller maintains the mechanical integrity from the initial torque applied, as the forces on the propeller blades aid to maintain the applied torque
I understand there were always exceptions to the preferred design criteria
Scale models built with standard taper shaft and
taper reamed propeller bores, and retained by an external threaded nut 5/8 times the diameter of the actual shaft
Controlled heating a bronze model propeller [with a taper reamed bore] to ~~ 150 degrees C, then sliding this onto the tapered stainless shaft and contained by the threaded nut will result with an installed joint that will never fail
Modern high speed craft are a different kettle of fish all together

I understand multi shaft vessels such as the Titanic were installed with tapered shaft mountings for her propellers
Derek