Model Boat Mayhem

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length.
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Quick question about burners  (Read 12503 times)

1967Brutus

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 447
  • I am in it for the learning!
  • Location: The Netherlands, Friesland to be more exact
Quick question about burners
« on: April 01, 2025, 10:37:45 am »

Hi Guys,

I happen to have a Microcosm M29 installation, and although the burner functions well, a minor downside is that minimum fire still is enough to pop the safety valve at the minimum sustainable fire.
It is a burner of the type with a fuel nozzle, mixing tube, and a cup-shaped burner with a perforated plate in it.
Now I was told the other day, that ceramic burners can regulate down much lower, and that it would be enough to get me a disk of this cheramic material and fit it on the fireside of the perforated plate.

Is this true?

If so, which glue/kit do I need to fix his material in place?

If not, which exact brand/type would fit?

Not at home right now, so I do not have a diameter of the furnace at hand.

TIA and best regards,

Bert.
Logged
If you do without observing, you won't learn a thing.
If you observe without doing, you'll never know if what you learned was true.

Mege66

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
  • Model Boat Mayhem is Great!
Re: Quick question about burners
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2025, 05:14:42 pm »

Hi Bert
I assume that you have to use a fire resistant cement from a stove /chimney builder. But I have no experience with such stuff.
Why don‘t you simply use a ceramic burner from the BIX range or from Martin Baylis? If the fire tube should be larger than 28 mm outside, then you may have to add a turned brass adapter piece.
Logged

1967Brutus

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 447
  • I am in it for the learning!
  • Location: The Netherlands, Friesland to be more exact
Re: Quick question about burners
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2025, 07:54:01 pm »

Hi Bert
I assume that you have to use a fire resistant cement from a stove /chimney builder. But I have no experience with such stuff.
Why don‘t you simply use a ceramic burner from the BIX range or from Martin Baylis? If the fire tube should be larger than 28 mm outside, then you may have to add a turned brass adapter piece.

That is an option too, but I an hesitant in that it most likely will have different thread sizes for the fuel line connections, and I really dislike "non-standard"...
As it is, I am allready combining Regner thread standards with those of Microcosm, prefer not to add another size, and I suspect Martin Bayliss to use imperial thread sizes.

Besides, it would be fun if I could do this myself.

The question left unanswered is: am I correctly informed that ceramic burners can handle much lower fire settings? And is it indeed as simple as fitting a piece of ceramic material? Or is the tech behind it (nozzle and mixing tube) different?
Logged
If you do without observing, you won't learn a thing.
If you observe without doing, you'll never know if what you learned was true.

Mege66

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
  • Model Boat Mayhem is Great!
Re: Quick question about burners
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2025, 05:04:05 pm »

Well, I have both types of burners in use and always in combination with a gas attenuator valve.


And both burner types can be throttled down by the attenuator valves to a level where the boiler safety valve doesn't blow off anymore. I couldn't tell a difference.


But I assume that the ceramic burner with its red glowing ceramic insert is more tolerant to loose the flame. But saying so, I never had any issue with any of the two types of burner at all.


My best answer is this: it doesn't really make a notable difference.
Logged

Mege66

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
  • Model Boat Mayhem is Great!
Re: Quick question about burners
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2025, 05:08:38 pm »

And yes, Martin Baylis - and almost any other UK supplier - uses ME threads on the gas connectors.
1/4“ x 32 (or 40) tpi to be more precise.
Logged

pipercub1772

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 158
  • Location: lancashire
Re: Quick question about burners
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2025, 08:44:49 pm »

If i understand correctly the burner produces to much heat at the lowest you can turn down the gas valve could you not simply fit a smaller gas jet
Logged

1967Brutus

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 447
  • I am in it for the learning!
  • Location: The Netherlands, Friesland to be more exact
Re: Quick question about burners
« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2025, 01:49:09 am »

Well, I have both types of burners in use and always in combination with a gas attenuator valve.


And both burner types can be throttled down by the attenuator valves to a level where the boiler safety valve doesn't blow off anymore. I couldn't tell a difference.


But I assume that the ceramic burner with its red glowing ceramic insert is more tolerant to loose the flame. But saying so, I never had any issue with any of the two types of burner at all.


My best answer is this: it doesn't really make a notable difference.

Well, my burner does not allow itself to be throttled down far enough to not pop the safety with stopped engine (otherwise I wouldn't be asking :D :D :D )


FWIW (and I don't know if this makes any difference), I am using a Regner RC gas throttle valve, controlled via telemetry boiler pressure feedback.
The valve can go all the way down to "flame out" so I don't think that is the problem.
Logged
If you do without observing, you won't learn a thing.
If you observe without doing, you'll never know if what you learned was true.

1967Brutus

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 447
  • I am in it for the learning!
  • Location: The Netherlands, Friesland to be more exact
Re: Quick question about burners
« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2025, 01:51:14 am »

If i understand correctly the burner produces to much heat at the lowest you can turn down the gas valve could you not simply fit a smaller gas jet

I don't know... Maybe. I do not know if flame stability at low fire is depending on nozzle size or on flame plate type.
But a smaller nozzle COULD cause lower top-end capacity.
I do not have any nozzles to experiment with, AFAIK, Microcosm does not sell different nozzle sizes.
Logged
If you do without observing, you won't learn a thing.
If you observe without doing, you'll never know if what you learned was true.

Mege66

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 42
  • Model Boat Mayhem is Great!
Re: Quick question about burners
« Reply #8 on: April 05, 2025, 07:34:10 am »

Hi Bert
Looking up your initial question, they should all be answered now. Lacking Microcosm experience, it is difficult to tell what might be the problem. If the burner with the lowest stable flame puts more energy into the boiler than it looses, then pressure will inevitably rise and the safety valve occasionally lift.
You can now either reduce energy introduction further or increase energy dissipation to a level there is a balance between both. I seem to remember that you have packed your boiler well with insulation material. So you may really have to use a smaller nozzle. But if you can‘t change it, then this will be difficult and you end up with your initial suggestion. Go and try it. Maybe it works, maybe not. You will loose a few Euros and some time, and all other Microcosm users will benefit from your findings. Anyone else will go the usual nozzle way or do not have this problem.

Logged

1967Brutus

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 447
  • I am in it for the learning!
  • Location: The Netherlands, Friesland to be more exact
Re: Quick question about burners
« Reply #9 on: April 05, 2025, 05:58:30 pm »

Hi Bert
Looking up your initial question, they should all be answered now. Lacking Microcosm experience, it is difficult to tell what might be the problem. If the burner with the lowest stable flame puts more energy into the boiler than it looses, then pressure will inevitably rise and the safety valve occasionally lift.
You can now either reduce energy introduction further or increase energy dissipation to a level there is a balance between both. I seem to remember that you have packed your boiler well with insulation material. So you may really have to use a smaller nozzle. But if you can‘t change it, then this will be difficult and you end up with your initial suggestion. Go and try it. Maybe it works, maybe not. You will loose a few Euros and some time, and all other Microcosm users will benefit from your findings. Anyone else will go the usual nozzle way or do not have this problem.

The boiler lagging is still "original", with bare front and back and only a thin layer of wood around the shell.


Another question: Who sells this ceramic material?
Logged
If you do without observing, you won't learn a thing.
If you observe without doing, you'll never know if what you learned was true.

1967Brutus

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 447
  • I am in it for the learning!
  • Location: The Netherlands, Friesland to be more exact
Re: Quick question about burners
« Reply #11 on: April 06, 2025, 01:16:14 pm »

Thanks, man!
Logged
If you do without observing, you won't learn a thing.
If you observe without doing, you'll never know if what you learned was true.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.098 seconds with 22 queries.