Model Boat Mayhem

The Shipyard ( Dry Dock ): Builds & Questions => Steam => Topic started by: Circlip on April 29, 2013, 09:41:36 am

Title: New Boiler regs
Post by: Circlip on April 29, 2013, 09:41:36 am
Saw this on another forum :-
 
 
14.1 For the purposes of this Test Code ‘small boilers’ are defined as
those with a pressure-volume product below 3 bar litres.
Examination and test of this type of boiler is applicable if the boiler
is fitted with (as a minimum requirement) a safety valve and a
pressure gauge. The boiler may also be fitted with a water level
gauge and a mechanical method of pumping water in to the boiler
whilst under working pressure. If no means of supplying water to
the boiler whilst working is present the fuel supply shall be so
arranged that it is used up before the water is completely used.

 
  This means that as from 1st Jan this year that no longer will Mamod, Wilesco and Saito boiler owners be able to fly "Under the wire" due to the old low volume/pressure ratings when operating publicly without a valid test certificate.
 
  Regards  Ian.
 
  Don't be fooled into thinking "If fitted or Applicable" would carry much weight if litigation is used. It's another way for an insurance company to engage maximum reverse gear.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Jerry C on April 29, 2013, 10:26:29 am
Ian, is there something missing here? What if the boiler is not fitted with safety valve, pressure gauge and sight glass? What is the reference for this? Is it a regulation, law or code?
Jerry.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: derekwarner on April 29, 2013, 11:35:22 am
Guys....why not read the more direct text version..........courtesy of a certain few competent members on an alternate WEB site....... :-)) ....the implications ...even when they filter down to OZ could certainly cloud our hobby....... >>:-( ....Derek
 
http://www.modelenginemaker.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1817.0;attach=4993 (http://www.modelenginemaker.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1817.0;attach=4993)



Sorry Derek but we can't see the above if we are not members.    ken

Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: gondolier88 on April 29, 2013, 05:41:44 pm
As I see it this is a document written by the Model Engineering Liaison Group, for direction to members of clubs/societies for display of boilers under steam pressure.


For boilers below 3BarLitre the examination would be done at the factory by the manufacturer, or by the club/society upon the owner becoming a member of the club/society, with the test being for life for boilers of 3BarLitre or less.


For owners who show their boilers of 3BarLitres or less in public, and who aren't members of clubs/societies, then the directive does not apply, and good practice would of still stand.


Unless there is a amendment to the PSSR 2000 regulations, then for owners of small boilered plants, nothing has changed, unless you are a member of a model engineering society/club that falls under the directive from the Model Engineering Liaison Group.


Greg
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Jerry C on April 29, 2013, 06:32:06 pm
Hi Greg, so it's a code and not a law? Written by club members not parliament? My insurers (house & contents) happy to give £5 million public liability cover for model steamboats. It only seems to be club people effected. My boiler and gas tank certificates have no expiry date or timespan mentioned and the guy that makes em says they don't need retesting.
Jerry.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Circlip on April 29, 2013, 07:52:17 pm
Hi Guys,

 There has been some major changes to the UK boiler regulations and there is now NO EXCLUSION for boilers of 3 Bar-Litre or under.

 I attach a copy of the latest UK rules which became effective on 1st January 2013.[/u][/b]

 Unfortunately it now means ALL boilers used in public must now have a valid test certificate... which can only be issued via a club or a recognised commercial manufacturer.

 Some insurance companies do have a recognised tester on their books so that may be of some use.

 Sorry to post bad news.

 Best regards.

 SandyC.

 EDIT: These new rules are freely available for download on the internet so there is no copyright issue here.                             
2012_Test_Code_V12a.pdf (http://www.homemodelenginemachinist.com/attachments/f42/61572d1366281029-uk-model-boilers-2012_test_code_v12a.pdf) (115.4 KB, 34 views 

 Hopefully the PDF link on this one works Derek.  Yes, it is a CODE and not law, but anyone attending one of the steam regattas advertised on this site may not be able to float their boats if the plant doesn't comply.Since even the lowly Mamod boiler is fitted with a safety valve, it would be pointless trying to argue the code doesn't apply,
 
  I like to think that all members who float toy boats with fires inside them are competent Derek but unfortunately Numpties still abound.
 
  Regards  Ian
 
 
 
 
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: TheLongBuild on April 29, 2013, 10:07:06 pm
25 pages of Woffle IMHOP  :police: 8)
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: gondolier88 on April 29, 2013, 11:13:33 pm
Ian,


Anyone who exhibits an insured boiler will have to satisfy the insurers that the plant is safe to operate in public, and will ask for proof of competence should an emergency occur, for which a manufacturer's test certificate is sufficient.


For boilers of less than 3BarLitre, under UK Law they do not require insuring, or a valid test certificate to appear in public, which,of course, means that should an emergency occur them the owner is entirely liable- meaning that in reality the majority of Mamod owners operate them in the back garden etc. where if fingers get burnt it's through curiosity and not accident.


The code of practice that has been written by the Model Engineering Liaison Group (MELG) is for members to comply with if requiring insurance to appear in public at MELG attended events. This practice spans most organisations, including the Traction Engine Trust and The Steamboat Association to mention but two. In order for members of those groups to appear in public as members of those groups they must adhere to their membership declaration, which will stipulate that they must adhere to their particular group's code of practice. This means that as a member you are provided with the appropriate services for free, or reasonable cost, to make sure you are compliant. This means that members have no excuse, and to attend events must be insured, and to be insured you must have valid test tickets. It also means that the groups/association/club/society that is responsible for their member's compliance  have no liability as they have taken all reasonable action to make sure that members comply with their particular code of practice.


Joe public, who takes his Mamod to the local pub does not require insurance or a valid boiler ticket, unless he is exhibiting his Mamod as a representative and/or member of one of the model engineering societies that is part of the MELG, in which case he would be contravening his own membership declaration and would void any membership benefits, including liability, should an accident occur.


THE ONLY WAY THIS WILL AFFECT ANY MEMBERS OF THIS FORUM IS IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF A MODEL ENGINEERING SOCIETY WHICH IS IN TURN A MEMBER OF THE M.E.L.G.

THE ONLY WAY THIS WILL AFFECT MEMBERS OF THE FORUM WHO AREN'T MEMBERS OF RELEVANT MODEL ENGINEERING CLUBS, IS IF AN AMENDMENT IS MADE TO UK LAW, IN THIS CASE THE P.S.S.R. 2000 LEGISLATION, WHICH REPLACED THE OLD PRESSURE EQUIPMENT DIRECTIVE IN 2000.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: TheLongBuild on April 30, 2013, 12:02:21 am
1 page which makes it a bit clearer  %)
 
 
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: derekwarner on April 30, 2013, 12:37:56 am
Just a little more light reading...........Australia does seem to follow the British rules & regulations......so with this near instant world of communication.....wouldn't be surprised to see the same changes here very soon.................Derek
http://www.normodeng.org.uk/boiler_testing_2013.htm (http://www.normodeng.org.uk/boiler_testing_2013.htm)
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Circlip on April 30, 2013, 07:20:41 am
The post was created to inform those whom it might affect, that section 14 (Small Boilers) has been included and is effective from 1st Jan 2013.
Whether the complete plant  can be operated safely by the owner is another argument altogether but in the event of being told to take your boat off the local pond by a council jobsworth, being able to waft a bit of paper under their nose validating the test safety of the bit that most would regard as the dangerous part of an installation can only assist.
 If it doesn't, or you think it doesn't, or you don't care whether it affects you, fine but whatever weapons we can use in our armoury to prove to the great unwashed and unknowing that some of us take our playtimes responsibly it can only be to the greater good.
 
   Waters that allow I/C powered toy boats are few and far between, I wonder why? It only took a few with the "My toys engine makes a lot of noise -- get over it" attitude to screw it for the many, can't see the screaming electrics being allowed to carry on with impunity.
 
  Don't forget, when adding bits of "Bling" to an existing or New plant, you may be "modifying" the system - how many have fallen foul of insurance companies with car conversions?
 Think, act or ignore, it's your own choice.
 
  Regards  Ian.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: TheLongBuild on April 30, 2013, 01:53:55 pm
As far as I can see nothing has really changed for the Modeen Boiler I have.
 
It is classed as a small boiler, it only has a safety valve. I assume  from the text that I do not have to have a pressure guage fitted. The fuel burner will run out well before the boiler is empty (As long as filled correctly. (Talking of which what is the recomended fill level of a boiler, I allways do about 75%).
 I have in the past had it regulary tested at the Kirklees show each year, however for the past 2 have not been able to make it.
 
Personally if I have not used it for a while I will fire it up to check that the safety valve works, and that it is not damaged. {:-{
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: gondolier88 on April 30, 2013, 06:21:25 pm
  "Don't forget, when adding bits of "Bling" to an existing or New plant, you may be "modifying" the system - how many have fallen foul of insurance companies with car conversions?
 Think, act or ignore, it's your own choice."

Insurance companies insure a car based on risk, and insure the entire vehicle. Steam insurance policies are to insure a pressure vessel only, associated pipework and fittings, as long as they perform safely within their working limits and perform the duty they are designed to do to the same or better level than OEM, then insurers are happy as they do not compromise the pressure vessel. Insurance companies do not insure the 'system' as you put it, but only provide cover to the pressure vessel if proof that ancilliary systems that maintain the plant's safety are in good working order- basically, water supply, safety valve operation and pressure gauge accuracy.

If it was proven that modifications did not fall into the above standard, and an accident happened, then yes, there would be a problem with liability.

As an engineer who works with steam on a daily basis, and responsible organiser of a public regatta I'm well aware of liabilities and what is important and what isn't- the document above may be a well written code of practice that we would all do well to follow, but the fact of the matter is that anyone who can prove their plant is safe- ie. boiler cert., and is insured to a good enough standard- then they can display their boiler under steam in public. However, if their boiler is under 3BarLitres, then as unwise at it may be, they do not need insurance or a boiler certificate, to be within the remit if the law in the UK, if they wish to exhibit their plant in public.

As a regatta organiser I do specify that any steam boiler on public display as part of the regatta must have insurance, and if above 3BarLitres, a valid boiler certicate- this year boilers range from horizontal boilers that would fit in your hand, to loco boilers that hold around 200gal, with everything inbetween.

Greg
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: ooyah/2 on May 01, 2013, 11:51:09 pm
Hi Greg, so it's a code and not a law? Written by club members not parliament? My insurers (house & contents) happy to give £5 million public liability cover for model steamboats. It only seems to be club people effected. My boiler and gas tank certificates have no expiry date or timespan mentioned and the guy that makes em says they don't need retesting.
Jerry.

Jerry,
Don't forget that although you have a hydraulic test for the life of the boiler under the new Regs you will require a steam test at ( 1.5 x working pressure )and every 12 months thereafter. (Small boiler code 14.6 )

Also if you read on page 1- off the new Regs  Introduction item 1.5 which reads

This document has been agreed and approved by the principle provider of insurance to the modelengineering hobby.
Individuals or orginisations seeking insurance from other insurers need to check that the requirements herein are acceptable to their insurer.


So I would think that if you are intending to go to any shows that are using this code you would need some sort of certification or other from your home insurers to satisfy any show organizer that you were insured.

It would be a great shame if you intended to  travel some distance to a show or regatta and be refused the opportunity to sail S.L.WEIR. if you arrived without some sort of proof.

George.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Jerry C on May 03, 2013, 02:51:54 pm
Hi again George. Ref the steam test at 1.5 x wp.. How is that actually done? Is the boiler placed in some kind of protected area/enclosure, as if the test failed couldn't  there be an explosion?
Jerry.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: ooyah/2 on May 03, 2013, 06:24:36 pm
Hi again George. Ref the steam test at 1.5 x wp.. How is that actually done? Is the boiler placed in some kind of protected area/enclosure, as if the test failed couldn't  there be an explosion?
Jerry.

Hi JERRY,
Here is the link to download a copy of the new boiler regs (   2012_Test_Code_V12a.pdf ) (http://www.homemodelenginemachinist.com/attachments/f42/61572d1366281029-uk-model-boilers-2012_test_code_v12a.pdf)  put plenty of paper in your printer, there's 25 pages.

A steam test is done after the boiler has been certified after it's Hydraulic test of 2 x wP. and is done with all the boiler fittings on with the steam delivery valve closed to check the integrity of the fittings.

If you down load the boiler regs look at 14.6 for SMALL BOILERS   where it gives the test procedure.

There is no need to have the boiler in a protected area as you already have a Hydraulic test of 2 x wP certificate for your boiler  but one is useless without the other.
In the boiler regs it states who are the main insurers for model boilers in the engineeringhobby.

There absolutely no chance of a boiler explosion during a steam test at 1.5 x wP, the worst that can happen is a steam leak from a fitting, if somebody has been telling you that there could be an explosion they're winding you up or they have no experience of steam testing a boiler.

In all my years in building and testing model boilers I have never heard of one exploding other than the You-Tube one of the young scientist in the South Atlantic who seamed to think that the boiler bursting was a great laugh.

Since my last post I have had a conversation with an insurance assessor who has never heard of his or any other insurance company who would cover a model boiler under steam in house insurance, so possibly it would do no harm to check that yours does and have some written proof to present to an orginisers appointed tester.

I posted to you to save the possibility of you traveling some distance to a show or regatta and being refused to steam and sail your model without the appropriate documentation.

Are you a member of a club that sails on Lynn Padarn that abide by  the Test Code or are you just a bunch of guys that sail on that water ?

Hope that this helps

George.
 
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Jerry C on May 03, 2013, 06:48:26 pm
Thanks for that George. I wasn't sure about the 1.5x test. 2x test is hydraulic and cold whereas 1.5x test is hot. It all makes sense if its just to test the fittings. Nobody told me any had exploded but if something did go wrong then under hydraulic pressure there can't be an explosion but under steam at 90 psi it could. I've already arranged with the Coniston people re insurance and testing and they are happy. My insurance is with Lloyds Bank and its a plain English schedule. It says under "What is NOT covered":- cars, boats and aircraft, UNLESS they are models. I called them and they put me in touch with one of the Underwriters and he said if it says model boat it's covered, steam or otherwise.
     The guys who sail on Llyn Padarn are people who don't want to be in clubs for whatever reasons. We use a public slipway and the only enemy is the parking meter and his handler. The only rule is the one that says I have to bring the doughnuts for lunch! 5 for a quid fresh from the Spar in llanberis.
Jerry.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Jerry C on May 03, 2013, 06:58:13 pm
George, I've just read that PDF file and realise the 1.5x test is hydraulic and not steam. The steam test is later at Pw + 10%  . I wondered how they could steam at 1.5x without holding the safety v/v down!!
Thanks again
Jerry.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: ooyah/2 on May 03, 2013, 07:20:54 pm
George, I've just read that PDF file and realise the 1.5x test is hydraulic and not steam. The steam test is later at Pw + 10%  . I wondered how they could steam at 1.5x without holding the safety v/v down!!
Thanks again
Jerry.


 Hi Jerry,
 I think that you should have another read at the Regs,
 The 1.5 x wP is most definitely the steam test and 2 x wP is Hydraulic.
 
 The 10% is the max that is allowed for the gauge to show above the wP on the pressure gauge  with the burner full on and the safety blowing.
 
 If the working pressure is say 50 p.s.i. the 10% is all that is allowed for the needle on the gauge to be above 50 p.s.i. when the burner is full on and a red line should be drawn on the gauge face to show the max 10% increase.and a red line should be marked on the gauge face to show the max allowed.
 
 It is recommended that pressure gauges should be twice the working pressure to allow the 1.5 x wP test to show.
 
 The Regs explain it better than I can but hopefully you can see where I am coming from
 
 George.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Jerry C on May 03, 2013, 07:40:45 pm
George, that's not how I read it. I copied and paste para 14.3:-

14.3 The boiler shall be subjected to an initial hydraulic shell pressure test of TWICE working pressure (2 x PW) and is valid for the life of the boiler. A repeat hydraulic pressure test shall be conducted after the appropriate working components have been attached to the boiler shell to prove the pressure and structural integrity for the interface of the boiler fittings. This includes the pressure gauge. The applied pressure shall be ONE and ONE HALF times working pressure (1.5 x PW). The test method is as described in Section 10 of this Test Code.

Then the rest:-


14.6 A visual examination of the pressure system pipe work shall be conducted. The pressure gauge shall be checked for accuracy against the calibrated test gauge, particularly the red line, prior to conducting the steam test. The steam test shall be carried out immediately after the first hydraulic test (1.5 x PW) and every 12 months thereafter. The boiler shall be steamed at the maximum firing rate of the fuel. The test shall be continued for sufficient time as to allow the inspector to be satisfied that stable conditions have been attained. The operation of the safety valve(s) shall be checked to make certain that they operate at the working pressure of the boiler (PW) (see paragraph 3.5) and that the pressure does not rise by more than 10% of the working pressure (PW + 10%) during safety valve operation (limit pressure PL). If fitted, the correct operation of the water level gauge and the boiler water feed pump shall be verified.

If you insert of between hydraulic test (of) 1.5 x PW it makes more sense.

I read the last bit to say boiler is steamed at Pw and that as you say the pressure should not rise more than 10% after the safety lifts.

If the safety valve should not be adjusted, how do they make the the boiler steam at 1.5x Pw?

I'm not trying to be funny but that's how I read it.

Jerry.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: ooyah/2 on May 03, 2013, 08:17:10 pm
George, that's not how I read it. I copied and paste para 14.3:-

14.3 The boiler shall be subjected to an initial hydraulic shell pressure test of TWICE working pressure (2 x PW) and is valid for the life of the boiler. A repeat hydraulic pressure test shall be conducted after the appropriate working components have been attached to the boiler shell to prove the pressure and structural integrity for the interface of the boiler fittings. This includes the pressure gauge. The applied pressure shall be ONE and ONE HALF times working pressure (1.5 x PW). The test method is as described in Section 10 of this Test Code.

Then the rest:-


14.6 A visual examination of the pressure system pipe work shall be conducted. The pressure gauge shall be checked for accuracy against the calibrated test gauge, particularly the red line, prior to conducting the steam test. The steam test shall be carried out immediately after the first hydraulic test (1.5 x PW) and every 12 months thereafter. The boiler shall be steamed at the maximum firing rate of the fuel. The test shall be continued for sufficient time as to allow the inspector to be satisfied that stable conditions have been attained. The operation of the safety valve(s) shall be checked to make certain that they operate at the working pressure of the boiler (PW) (see paragraph 3.5) and that the pressure does not rise by more than 10% of the working pressure (PW + 10%) during safety valve operation (limit pressure PL). If fitted, the correct operation of the water level gauge and the boiler water feed pump shall be verified.

If you insert of between hydraulic test (of) 1.5 x PW it makes more sense.

I read the last bit to say boiler is steamed at Pw and that as you say the pressure should not rise more than 10% after the safety lifts.

If the safety valve should not be adjusted, how do they make the the boiler steam at 1.5x Pw?

I'm not trying to be funny but that's how I read it.

Jerry.


Hi Jerry,
I know you are not trying to be funny but here is how I steam test after initial Hydraulic and then every year after.

For the 1.5 x wP test I set the safety to  1.5 x wP and then reset it back to the original wP value, it's the only way that I read it and can do it and as the appointed inspector. have the authority to do so.

I do agree with you that in 14.1 there is a bit of ambiguity there as the first Hydraulic should read 2 x wP and I have always understood that test thereafter was 1.5 x wP every 2 years , then it was 4  and now as long as it's 3 bar  litre or under it's for the boilers life

I feel that the people who made up the Regs have not spent too much time on small model steam boilers and most of their thoughts are on Locos which as you know can work at quite high pressures.

Jerry,
 Just had another read at your post of 6.48 pm.
 Just a query on the underwriters statement that " model boats, steam or other wise" its not the model boat that requires insurance but the "model boiler and associated steam fittings "
 
 If you have cleared it with the Coniston organizers without a full test certification that's O.K. but must say that I am more than surprised.
 
 I do envy you and your mates that are not an organized club which takes you out of all these boiler Regs and you are free to sail as you please but keep it under your hat in case some Jobs worth in Llanberis may take it upon himself to regulate you.
 
 George.



Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Jerry C on May 03, 2013, 08:43:30 pm
The lake is full of jobsworths who have tried!!
Jerry.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: john s 2 on May 03, 2013, 09:59:32 pm
Can anyone please clarify exactly what is a Tester? It appears to me that there is no approved course and certification. Merely a compotive person. So whats wrong in myself testing? If not so where do i become credited? It does seem anyone can label themselves a tester. I hope that i will be corrected. John.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: gondolier88 on May 03, 2013, 10:09:14 pm
Boiler testing, at any size, is a standard procedure- and for that matter a standard procedure for any pressure system.


1- Manufacturer test on construction completion, bare shell only, hydraulic test to twice working pressure.


2- Steam test to full working pressure with water gauges and safety valve attached, with full firing rate the safety valves should contain the pressure to a maximum of working pressure+10%.


3- In full size, to satisfy insurers, a boiler test is taken in it's working situation, and water supplies are checked, as are pressure gauge, SV's and water gauges to check for safe operation of all systems- although in model sizes this would occur in the club situation, or prior to an event where club insurance is not applicable.


4- For consecutive tests a hydro test to 1.5 x working pressure is standard across industry- as well as now being standard for clubs wanting to hydro test a boiler for insurance purposes, and would be done before step 3.


5- After consecutive hydro tests steps 2 and 3 are repeated each time.


UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD A BOILER EVER BE SUBJECTED TO 1.5 X WORKING STEAM PRESSURE UNDER STEAM, THIS WOULD REQUIRE MANIPULATING THE SAFETY VALVES TO MALFUNCTION PURPOSEFULLY, AND IN SETTING THEM LOWER BACK TO WORKING PRESSURE YOU HAVE VOIDED YOUR TEST CONDITIONS.


Any test equal to or above working pressure are done using hydraulic testing, and steam testing never occurs at more than WP+10%.


Jerry will be covered at Coniston, more than adequately, by his house insurers. Upon satisfactorily proving his plant is safe (step 3) then the organisers are happy that the plant is safe, operated competently and already have proof of insurance.


Greg
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: ooyah/2 on May 04, 2013, 06:32:42 am
Can anyone please clarify exactly what is a Tester? It appears to me that there is no approved course and certification. Merely a compotive person. So whats wrong in myself testing? If not so where do i become credited? It does seem anyone can label themselves a tester. I hope that i will be corrected. John.

John,
Have a read at Section 3 ( 3.9 ), there is a full explanation of who a Tester ( Inspector ) should be .
George.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: ooyah/2 on May 04, 2013, 10:19:23 am
Boiler testing, at any size, is a standard procedure- and for that matter a standard procedure for any pressure system.


1- Manufacturer test on construction completion, bare shell only, hydraulic test to twice working pressure.


2- Steam test to full working pressure with water gauges and safety valve attached, with full firing rate the safety valves should contain the pressure to a maximum of working pressure+10%.


3- In full size, to satisfy insurers, a boiler test is taken in it's working situation, and water supplies are checked, as are pressure gauge, SV's and water gauges to check for safe operation of all systems- although in model sizes this would occur in the club situation, or prior to an event where club insurance is not applicable.


4- For consecutive tests a hydro test to 1.5 x working pressure is standard across industry- as well as now being standard for clubs wanting to hydro test a boiler for insurance purposes, and would be done before step 3.


5- After consecutive hydro tests steps 2 and 3 are repeated each time.


UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD A BOILER EVER BE SUBJECTED TO 1.5 X WORKING STEAM PRESSURE UNDER STEAM, THIS WOULD REQUIRE MANIPULATING THE SAFETY VALVES TO MALFUNCTION PURPOSEFULLY, AND IN SETTING THEM LOWER BACK TO WORKING PRESSURE YOU HAVE VOIDED YOUR TEST CONDITIONS.


Any test equal to or above working pressure are done using hydraulic testing, and steam testing never occurs at more than WP+10%.


Jerry will be covered at Coniston, more than adequately, by his house insurers. Upon satisfactorily proving his plant is safe (step 3) then the organisers are happy that the plant is safe, operated competently and already have proof of insurance.


Greg

Greg,
The  test code for small boilers  rule 14.6 clearly states that a steam test of 1.5 X wP should be carried out after the first Hydraulic test.
The only way that I can see to carry this out is,

a.-- by plugging the S.V. bush and firing the boiler to 1.5 x wP and as a Hydraulic has been done to 2 x wP  it is quite safe.
b-- to alter the owners S.V. to blow at the 1,5 x wP and reset after the test.
c-- Now do a steam test with the reset S.V. to +10% to which the certificate is issued and will be repeated annually.

It's true that if the S.V. is altered by the owner after the certification invalidates the test and the insurance cover.
However if you read rule 11.9 which covers the removal of a S.V. for cleaning and is reported back to the inspector he " may " wish to conduct a repeat steam test.

In your statement here which is quite adamant that a boiler should " never " be subjected to a steam test of 1.5 x wP which I see as contradicting the Test code  which has been made and used for years  with continuous updating by 8 - organizations, (see Introduction page 1-  rule 1.2 ) ,could you have perhaps miss read the code.
 If not can you please direct me to the code for " Model Boilers " that confirms your statement as I can't find it in the code.

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD A BOILER EVER BE SUBJECTED TO 1.5 X WORKING STEAM PRESSURE UNDER STEAM, THIS WOULD REQUIRE MANIPULATING THE SAFETY VALVES TO MALFUNCTION PURPOSEFULLY, AND IN SETTING THEM LOWER BACK TO WORKING PRESSURE YOU HAVE VOIDED YOUR TEST CONDITIONS.
 

George.




Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Circlip on May 04, 2013, 10:41:17 am
I would imagine anyone setting themselves up to test a boiler to the regs, would have suitable equipment to ensure all parts of the regs. can be adhered to? Setting a safety valve is not a product of the black arts or needs the supervision of Professor Snape, not that the great unwashed should attempt it without setting gear.
 
  A TESTER should be able to satisfy ALL requirements of the rules in complete safety.
 
  Regards  Ian.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: AlexC on May 04, 2013, 02:04:05 pm
Gentlemen,

As a boiler maker for many years I can assure you that whichever code you read/ adopt/follow, be it the original Pressure Equipment Regulations 1999, Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000 or this latest edition of The examination and Testing of Miniature Steam Boilers (v12a)
 
The Steam Accumulation Test is always specified as being performed at Normal Working Pressure with an allowance of 10% rise in pressure above the set pressure of the safety valve… i.e. Safe working pressure PL… (This should have been previously calibrated and set as a separate exercise).

Section 3.5 states… the safety valve should be set to open AT or BELOW the working pressure (Pw)

Regardless of boiler size (as covered by this code)…

The Accumulation test (Steam Test) should be carried out in accordance with section 11 of the code being discussed.

There appears to be some confusion with the wording in section 14.6, however the reference to the first hydro test (1.5 x Pw) is actually the same one specified in section 14.3… it does NOT mean the STEAM TEST which should never be at any higher pressure than PL (PW +10%). As per section 11.

For the 1.5 x PW hydro test (with all fittings attached) there is provision to remove the Pressure gauge if it has insufficient range… the same applies to the Safety Valve, since this has been previously calibrated and set… which can either be removed and replaced with a blanking plate/plug or it can be clamped shut… it should never be reset to 1.5 x Pw just to meet the 1.5 x Pw test pressure.

When we perform the boiler testing on the VIC 32 puffer we are bound by the
Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000, just as Greg is with GONDOLA and when it is required to perform the 1.5x Pw Hydro Test, it is necessary to clamp the safety valve in order for this to happen. Removal is not necessary and Adjustment to the higher pressure is not valid (it is not designed for that pressure (this could also be the case for many model safety valves)).
The 1.5x Pw Hydro Test and the subsequent Steam accumulation test are both carried out with the VIC 32 afloat.

It was me that posted the New Regs on the other site and it has stirred up quite a hornets nest. :((

As for Insurance… I think it would be wise to carefully study the SMALL PRINT where this is supposedly covered by Home Insurance… I think you will find that there are conditions applied (but not necessarily obvious) that some form of written document stating safety compliance is required should it be necessary to make a valid claim. <*<
 
I would find it hard to believe any Insurance company would be willing to cover any NON-Certified Steam BOILER.
 
I hope this helps calm the waters somewhat.
 
Best Regards.
 
AlexC :-)) :D AKA Sandcam or SandyC
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: ooyah/2 on May 04, 2013, 03:04:21 pm
Gentlemen,

As a boiler maker for many years I can assure you that whichever code you read/ adopt/follow, be it the original Pressure Equipment Regulations 1999, Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000 or this latest edition of The examination and Testing of Miniature Steam Boilers (v12a)
 
The Steam Accumulation Test is always specified as being performed at Normal Working Pressure with an allowance of 10% rise in pressure above the set pressure of the safety valve… i.e. Safe working pressure PL… (This should have been previously calibrated and set as a separate exercise).

Section 3.5 states… the safety valve should be set to open AT or BELOW the working pressure (Pw)

Regardless of boiler size (as covered by this code)…

The Accumulation test (Steam Test) should be carried out in accordance with section 11 of the code being discussed.

There appears to be some confusion with the wording in section 14.6, however the reference to the first hydro test (1.5 x Pw) is actually the same one specified in section 14.3… it does NOT mean the STEAM TEST which should never be at any higher pressure than PL (PW +10%). As per section 11.

For the 1.5 x PW hydro test (with all fittings attached) there is provision to remove the Pressure gauge if it has insufficient range… the same applies to the Safety Valve, since this has been previously calibrated and set… which can either be removed and replaced with a blanking plate/plug or it can be clamped shut… it should never be reset to 1.5 x Pw just to meet the 1.5 x Pw test pressure.

When we perform the boiler testing on the VIC 32 puffer we are bound by the
Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000, just as Greg is with GONDOLA and when it is required to perform the 1.5x Pw Hydro Test, it is necessary to clamp the safety valve in order for this to happen. Removal is not necessary and Adjustment to the higher pressure is not valid (it is not designed for that pressure (this could also be the case for many model safety valves)).
The 1.5x Pw Hydro Test and the subsequent Steam accumulation test are both carried out with the VIC 32 afloat.

It was me that posted the New Regs on the other site and it has stirred up quite a hornets nest. :((

As for Insurance… I think it would be wise to carefully study the SMALL PRINT where this is supposedly covered by Home Insurance… I think you will find that there are conditions applied (but not necessarily obvious) that some form of written document stating safety compliance is required should it be necessary to make a valid claim. <*<
 
I would find it hard to believe any Insurance company would be willing to cover any NON-Certified Steam BOILER.
 
I hope this helps calm the waters somewhat.
 
Best Regards.
 
AlexC :-)) :D AKA Sandcam or SandyC


 Hi Sandy,
 Thanks for the post , I now stand corrected in altering the S.V. to reach 1.5 x wP and in future will blank of the S.V. bush to get the required 1.5 x wP test as stated in my post as (a)
 So to get my mind clear on the subject and considering Gregs claim that under no circumstances should a boiler be subjected to 1.5 x wP working steam pressure, to perform the steam test on a boiler after the first Hydraulic test it must be raised to 1.5 x wP and then re- tested with the pre- set S.V. to the designed wP + 10%
 
 George.

Altered text to outside of quotes.  ken
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: ooyah/2 on May 04, 2013, 03:27:58 pm
Sandy,
I should have asked , am I correct in thinking that he 1.5 x wP steam test is for a new boiler only and any other presented without a test certificate.
George.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Jerry C on May 04, 2013, 03:51:06 pm
Alec C, George, Greg Et Al. I think we're getting there. If it's possible to write it all down more clearly then I'll give it a try.

1) build a boiler.
2) plug all openings except filler/safety valve.
3) completely fill boiler with water excluding all air.
4) attach primed pump fitted with accurate pressure gauge to filler/safety valve hole.
5) with pump, raise pressure in boiler in 10 psi stages looking for leaks, weeps and distortion until pressure is 2xPw.

6) if all ok, remove pressure, remove pump and drain boiler.
7) fit sight glass, pressure gauge (to be able to read up to 1.5xPw),clack valve, manifold(with unused holes plugged), steam outlet valve(shut) and if used, the whistle valve.
8) refill boiler, expelling all air, bleed whistle valve.
9) re attach primed pump.
10) with pump, raise pressure in 10 psi stages to 1.5xPw watching for weeps and leaks in fittings and observe correct values on boiler pressure gauge.
11) if all ok release pressure and drain boiler to operating level.
12) refit safety valve and raise steam on full gas pressure until safety valve lifts at Pw.
13) continue steaming and observe gauge until pressure stabilises at or below Pw + 10%.
14) if no leaks and pressure correct then test complete.

How's that? Me head hurts now!
Jerry.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: AlexC on May 04, 2013, 04:13:30 pm
Hi George,
 
Quote

 So to get my mind clear on the subject and considering Gregs claim that under no circumstances should a boiler be subjected to 1.5 x wP working steam pressure, to perform the steam test on a boiler after the first Hydraulic test it must be raised to 1.5 x wP and then re- tested with the pre- set S.V. to the designed wP   10%


Not quite right George... The first Hydro test is performed at 2 x PW and is a once off test. (other than if a repair, or modification, dictates it being repeated**)
 
The second (or any subsequent) hydro test (if required) is performed at 1.5 x Pw with all fittings attached (other than the Pressure gauge and/or safety valve if they are not set/suitable for the test pressure).
 
For boilers of 3 bar litre or less then this 1st 1.5 x PW hydro test does not need to be repeated and both this test and the previous 2 x Pw hydro test are valid for the life of the boiler.(again, the only exception would be if a repair, or modification, made it necessary**)
 
The Steam Accumulation test is then performed at Pw under full burner conditions.
The allowance is Pw  10% (this being PL) with the safety blowing.
 
There is no 1.5 x Pw steam test called for (at any stage of a boilers life) in any of the regulations since this would be a violation of section 11.8 (Pressure Limit PL)
 
The confusion is caused by the wording in section 14.6 where the bracketed (1.5x Pw) actually refers to the first (or subsequent) hydro test as per section 14.3... Not the STEAM TEST.
 
The only ANNUAL repeat test required for a boiler of 3Bar/Litres or less is the Steam test.
Which must be performed at MAX 14 months intervals.
 
 
** any repair or modification made to the boiler shell, or change to the setting of the safety valve and/or pressure gauge, must be reported to the Tester. It is then his decision which determines if the Hydro test/s need to be re done).
 
If such changes are not notified then the user is in breech of the code and his current certificates would be void... as would be his insurance, or any claim made under the insurance policy in such a case.  <*<
 
 
I hope that makes it a bit more clear George.
 
Best regards.
 
Sandy. :-))
 
EDIT... Jerry has got it correct... the only thing to remember though is that the testing must be performed by a authorised TESTER who will then issue the necessary certificates on satisfactory completion. Self testing is not legal for certification purposes, although you can perform them for your own satisfation prior to an Authorised test.
 
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: ooyah/2 on May 04, 2013, 05:23:03 pm
Hi George,
 
Not quite right George... The first Hydro test is performed at 2 x PW and is a once off test. (other than if a repair, or modification, dictates it being repeated**)
 
The second (or any subsequent) hydro test (if required) is performed at 1.5 x Pw with all fittings attached (other than the Pressure gauge and/or safety valve if they are not set/suitable for the test pressure).
 
For boilers of 3 bar litre or less then this 1st 1.5 x PW hydro test does not need to be repeated and both this test and the previous 2 x Pw hydro test are valid for the life of the boiler.(again, the only exception would be if a repair, or modification, made it necessary**)
 
The Steam Accumulation test is then performed at Pw under full burner conditions.
The allowance is Pw  10% (this being PL) with the safety blowing.
 
There is no 1.5 x Pw steam test called for (at any stage of a boilers life) in any of the regulations since this would be a violation of section 11.8 (Pressure Limit PL)
 
The confusion is caused by the wording in section 14.6 where the bracketed (1.5x Pw) actually refers to the first (or subsequent) hydro test as per section 14.3... Not the STEAM TEST.
 
The only ANNUAL repeat test required for a boiler of 3Bar/Litres or less is the Steam test.
Which must be performed at MAX 14 months intervals.
 
 
** any repair or modification made to the boiler shell, or change to the setting of the safety valve and/or pressure gauge, must be reported to the Tester. It is then his decision which determines if the Hydro test/s need to be re done).
 
If such changes are not notified then the user is in breech of the code and his current certificates would be void... as would be his insurance, or any claim made under the insurance policy in such a case.  <*<
 
 
I hope that makes it a bit more clear George.
 
Best regards.
 
Sandy. :-))
 
EDIT... Jerry has got it correct... the only thing to remember though is that the testing must be performed by a authorised TESTER who will then issue the necessary certificates on satisfactory completion. Self testing is not legal for certification purposes, although you can perform them for your own satisfation prior to an Authorised test.


Alex,
Thanks for your prompt reply, I have always tested boilers to the current Regs and you are right in saying that the confusion occurred at 14.6 and is now clear in my mind.
As I have just tested a new boiler to work at 50 p.s.i. and used what I thought was correct, (1.5 x wP  ) to 75 p.s.i. by blanking off the S.V. boss and there were no steam leaks or bowing of the shell so all is well.,  I shall however in future use the  use the Regs as described.

To Greg I acknowledge that you are correct in your statement on steam test.

George.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Circlip on May 04, 2013, 05:34:26 pm
Bout time the "Learned" bodies that generate the codes stopped laying the rules down which lead to an ambiguous understanding by continually smothering everything in legal bulls**t.
 
  For a number of decades, Muddle Ingineers did their own thing and tested the fruits of their labours to a set of rules which mainly covered Toy Locos. If the basic rules were applied to the manufacture of a small boiler, either copying a know design or even "rolling ones own" after following the design requirements of steam principles reinforced by people like Westbury and Harris, then everything in the garden was luverly.
 
  Thanks to the trans Atlantic adoption of "Litigation with everything", the Elfins and other Do Gooders had their fingers in the pie and recognised just how dangerous some, operating mobile pressure cookers, could wreak havoc amongst an unknowing public and should therefore be curbed from enjoying themselves without obeying tomes of officialdom written in the main by those who previously applied common sense, rote the rules down and then gave them to someone to translate into LEGAL SPEAK.
 
 If two who have been involved with the safe construction and operation of model boilers for many years can have a different understanding of the SAME requirement, then the codes should be untangled into PLAIN ENGLISH. While many who use commercial equipment may be issued with a test cert, there is no excuse for not knowing how the boiler has been tested to obtain the said piece of bumph. I'm not saying that the owner should know all the theoretical design figures for it, You don't need a degree in thermo dynamics to know your car has failed its test due to emissions or Advanced Maffs to know their aint enough thickness of rubber on the skins, but there is no excuse for not knowing the reasons for it and how they are obtained.
 
  Regards  Ian.
 
 As an addition, my own miss interpretation of 14.1 would leave me to believe that if I chose to fit a pressure gauge to a Mamod (which has a safety valve) then it falls into a test section when previously exempt.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Jerry C on May 04, 2013, 06:18:10 pm
Well said Ian. So good to see that us old steamers can have a discussion without getting steamed up. Strange how a missing comma or a small word can cause so much confusion.
George, have a nice meeting tomorrow. I hope the weather stays fine for you.
Jerry.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: AlexC on May 04, 2013, 09:49:46 pm
 :-)) :}
 
George, Ian, Jerry, et al...
 
I am pleased to have been of some help and glad we got this sorted so that WE are all singing from the same song sheet.
 
As is often the case with such documents (be they Legislation or codes of practice), a simple thing like a missing comma, or word, can make decoding things somewhat confussing.
 
I do wonder sometimes, who proof reads such documents and supposedly corrects such errors prior to publication... clearly they miss the odd one or two >>:-( , which leads to such confusion.
 
Keep happy and enjoy your boating.
 
Best regards.
 
AlexC ok2 :-)) :}
 
 
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: ooyah/2 on May 05, 2013, 12:02:26 am
Well said Ian. So good to see that us old steamers can have a discussion without getting steamed up. Strange how a missing comma or a small word can cause so much confusion.
George, have a nice meeting tomorrow. I hope the weather stays fine for you.
Jerry.

Hi Jerry,
Yes some times we agree and other times we don't so sometimes we have to agree to disagree with no need to shout at each other.

It's all Alex Cambell's fault for publishing the link to the New Regs, if we didn't know about them we could have lived in ignorant bliss. ( only kidding Alex. )

On reading Ians post with reference to Westbury and Harris it made me wonder why I was so sure that Clause 14.3 refered to 1.5 x wP as a steam test so I decided to look up Harris's book on boilers and testing and low and behold way back in 1967 K.N.Harris quotes that the steam test should be no more than 25% of the boilers wP and to acheive that the safety valve was adjusted and then returned to it's original setting. ( pages 126-127-128 ) you will remember them Ian way back then and how simple and efficient it all seams.
As things stand and we want insurance we must stick to those who must be obeyed.

Jerry I hope that the weather is a bit better for my clubs First Show of the year, today has been very cold and windy so hopefully it will be a bit better tomorrow.
.
I shall not be there as I am otherwise engaged on a Sunday, I think round about Wednesday the outcome of the show will be on the club web site it will be worth a look as there are some more developments in our modeling achievements

Good night and God bless..

George.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: derekwarner on May 05, 2013, 12:33:52 am
Thanks to all for the new Boiler Regulations clarification's....
Will someone communicate with the authors of the original recommendations commencing in January 2013 & request a revised set of recommendations be produced?.....
The reason I ask is the original December 2012 .docs may already reside here in Australia.....& the provision of the revisions would eliminate the nausea of going down the same questioning path.....Derek
 
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: AlexC on May 05, 2013, 11:50:12 am
Hi Guy's,
 
Not sure what is going on with the forum... I posted a reply at 9:46PM last night and it went missing.
The Index of new posts (front page of the forum)registered that a new post had been added to the thread at that time and under my user name, however, the content of the post was not showing... all very strange!! {:-{
 
Anyway... I am pleased my input was of some help in restoring equilibrium and that we are now all singing from the same song sheet.
 
Quote
On reading Ians post with reference to Westbury and Harris it made me wonder why I was so sure that Clause 14.3 refered to 1.5 x wP as a steam test so I decided to look up Harris's book on boilers and testing and low and behold way back in 1967 K.N.Harris quotes that the steam test should be no more than 25% of the boilers wP and to acheive that the safety valve was adjusted and then returned to it's original setting. ( pages 126-127-128 ) you will remember them Ian way back then and how simple and efficient it all seams.

 
George, Ian and Jerry... I have just looked up my copy of Harris (which may be a later edition than yours) and my copy states...
 
on page 126... " with a steam test, a pressure of 25%, in excess of working pressure is sufficient"
 
and on page 128 it does indeed say that "the safety valve/s will either have to be set temporarily to blow of at the required higher pressure, or removed and their sockets temporarily plugged".
 
So I can see where this would lead to confusion with regard to the wording in the latest regs. section 14.6.
 
Unfortunately, Harris's method fails to address the purpose of the ACCUMULATION TEST in that it does not prove that the safety valve is capable of releasing all excess steam without the pressure rising more than 25% (our latest testing is 10%) above working pressure when fired at maximum. It merely proves that the safety valve/s open at Pw + 25%.

It would also not comply with section 3.5 and section 11 of the latest regs.

The problem is/was that, at that time in history, no real statutory regulations existed and most countries, clubs, authorities (local or otherwise) made there own rules up.
It was not really until the Pressure Equipment Regulations 1999 were published that any form of common rule applied.( but even these were open to interpretation)
 
What this does highlight though is the need for all of us to follow the LATEST REGULATIONS, for the particular country we live in, whether we agree with them or not.
It certainly does not help us much though, when the regulations are ambiguous as written.
 
Derek: -
 
I have already been in touch with the publishers regarding this and await some sort of response. Not holding my breath though 8)
 
Ok then, Keep happy and enjoy your steam models.
 
Best regards,
 
AlexC. (sandy) :-))
 
 
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: ooyah/2 on May 05, 2013, 09:16:26 pm
Hi Alex,

Yes the Regs were are thing that just were not in existence when Harris published his book , however it has been a great source of reference on many occasions, both his boiler book and engine book and still books to have in your library.

Thanks for taking the time to explain where I went wrong, how much nicer it is when you take the time to explain rather being told point blank that you are wrong.

It's good to know that you are lurking in the back ground ready to keep us correct.

Regards
George.
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: Geoff on June 18, 2013, 02:17:16 pm
I looked into this some time ago and made some notes which I summarise below. Is my understanding correct as regards the Cheddar Pufin boilers? Sorry it's long but just truying to get a laymans perspective.
 
Cheers
 
G
 
New rules have been introduced in 2006/2007 for the testing of model steam boilers. From the web it appears that the new regulations apply only to those boilers in the 500 to 1100 bar litre capacity but also that those below 1.5 bar litres are exempt. Boiler testing needs to be done every 14 months that in practice equates to annually.

Bar litre capacity is calculated by taking the total water capacity (measured in litres) x working pressure (measured in bars) with 1 bar equating to 14.50 pounds per square inch.

For example a boiler with a 1 litre capacity and designed to operate at 3 bar works out at 1 litre x 3 bar = 3 bar litre capacity so the new pressure regulations will apply. This should mean that a boiler with less than 500 cc capacity will fall below the new regulations.

There are two elements, pressure testing & steam testing which are different within the new regulations. From what I have seen on the web the gist is that the new regulations apply to boilers with a capacity in excess of 1.5 bar litres and do not apply to those boilers with measurements below this but this seems in conflict with the higher numbers frequently shown, 500 – 1100 bar litres?

The pressure test is relatively simple in that a hydraulic test is carried out on a new boiler to two times its working pressure (working pressure is typically the pressure when the safety valve blows) and one and a half times working pressure on an old boiler. If I recall correctly this is done twice, the first time for 10mins then for 20mins and any leakage or drop in pressure will constitute failure.

For steam testing this appears to be more complicated as a number of features need to be tested:

1)      Boiler feed water arrangements and there must be two – a hand pump and an engine powered pump will suffice, as would two water injectors.
2)      Pressure gauge
3)      Water gauge including blow down arrangements
4)      Safety valve

Again my understanding, and please correct me if I am wrong, is that the steam testing also applies to boilers with a 500-1100 bar litre capacity so once again does not apply to small boilers as otherwise all small boilers will automatically fail as they don’t have two water supplies. Most don’t have any way to replenish the water at all and rely on the initial capacity.

This all appears to be enshrined in European Law which also prohibit, and makes illegal, local regulations being in force which conflicts with the European Law. The effect of this would appear to prohibit clubs from refusing someone without a pressure certificate from sailing provided their boiler is below 1.5 bar litres capacity.

The only reference I have found to small boilers indicates that they should be physically inspected annually and the safety valve checked to see it works.

So what does this mean in practice for the small-scale sailing enthusiast?

Take a mark one Cheddar Models Puffin boiler. According to Chedder’s literature the capacity is just over a third of a litre, say 0.33. So we get 0.33 x the working pressure which is 3 bars = 0.9 so a Puffin boiler would appear to be well below the legal limit for testing.

What about the Puffin mark two boiler. Cheddar say the water capacity is 40% higher so we would get 0.33 x 1.40% = 0.462 x 3bar = 1.386 so would again appear to be below the limit.

Gas tanks seem to be subject to different regulations and I have not located any clear reference to this at this time but there appears to be a size limit that applies as well.




 
Title: Re: New Boiler regs
Post by: TAG on June 23, 2013, 05:31:35 pm
My understanding of the position with gas tanks from when I attended a testing seminar on boiler testing was as follows:
They come under "The Portable Gas Container Regulations" which come under The Department of Transport who in November 2010 were still reviewing matters.
Anyone know what the present position is other than insurance companies quoting a maximum total capacity of 250 millilitres?
It is interesting to note that the "Pressure Vessel Regulations" come under The Department of Business, Innovation and Skills.
I wonder if each department speaks unto the other!
Regards
Tim