Found this if it's any use.... looks like they both turn anti-clock! :oLooking at the picture I would very humbly suggest that you look at again. The leading edge of the stbd. prop. is "screwing in" and so is then an "outward" turning item. Sorry to rain on your parade! BY.
(http://swiftboats.org/reunion/2007/nab/104tour/touroftheboat.jpg)
You could always email them and ask...... http://pcf45.com/dedication/vumdirections.html (http://pcf45.com/dedication/vumdirections.html)
depends from where your looking {-).We have been down this route before. In the UK we look at the props from aft. In many European countries they look from the front. That is why when you order a "right handed" prop from your local model shop it comes back as a "left"....'cos they are all made in some faraway country if which we know little. If you want a "right handed" prop then order a "left-handed" one!
i supose there is a propper way of reading the direction ,either from the front or back .
daz
We'll have to continue to agree to disagree about that, I've yet to come across the country that views from in front.Just about all of them. Especially the Netherlands.
Standing to be corrected... ;D
Sometimes a model can steer to one side when you have both same handed props running in the same direction. :o
I think....No it is'nt. I have been waiting for ages for someone else to reply to this! Look very carefully at an enlarged bit of the pic. and you will see that they screw outwards. Presumably for ahead movement. I would absolutely HATE to have to drive a boat/ship with the props turning the same way....although I believe WW2 Lancaster bombers all had screws turning in the same direction. (?).
They do both go the same way,'cept it's to the right not to the left.
So you're both kinda right.
Just like the props :)
Christian Esquire and fellow Forum MembersYou mention surface-piercing props. Can you tell me (us) why this should be? If it was done "on purpose", then could it be to do with a reduction in the effects of transverse thrust? Interesting concept. Cheers. BY.
It seems that I may have caused us to take this into the realms of High Speed Record breaking and Experimental craft of pre-hostility years.
Mr Christian is quite correct as far as his statements are concerned. Comments regarding the harbour defence launch – if my memory does serve me rightly, these had a variety of diesel engines within, from a 300 bhp Gardner to a 300 bhp BUDA LEANOVA. Their top speed was something in the region of 11-12 knots I believe. Their propellers were of opposite hand.
Now may I come to the subject which is close to my heart. Mr Christian mentions propellers turning in the same direction; I believe he is of the mind of early experimental MTBs built by Vosper. These were built between 1936 and 1939, under the command of Commander (E) P. du Cane, R.N. (head designer for Vosper) - he designed the majority of Vosper’s MTBs. One batch in particular, if my fading memory is correct, were MTBs 101 to 103. These had a step in their hull and they originally had three Italian petrol engines (per craft) fitted which were of Isotta-Fraschini, of 1200 h.p. each. In their early lives, these were experimental craft. They were indeed fitted with a variety of propellers. At one time they were fitted with twin-bladed propellers, which did significantly improve their performance and speed. However, they could not cure the vibration because technology was not available then as we have today.
Fruits were gained from these experiments, after the war years, for the record breaking craft. Slo-mo-shun IV was a craft which was a world speed record holder on water, she used the technology of surface piercing propellers of the 2 blade design, where half of the propeller actually runs out of the water. The actual propeller size for those who are interested had a pitch of 25 inches and a diameter of 13 and 5/8 inches.