Model Boat Mayhem

Mess Deck: General Section => Full Scale Ships => Topic started by: Martin (Admin) on August 24, 2013, 05:26:12 pm

Title: Ugly ships !
Post by: Martin (Admin) on August 24, 2013, 05:26:12 pm
I thought we had a topic for this somewhere...

No.1. UECC Autobay

(http://www.uecc.com/portals/0/Images/Vessels/Auto_Bay/Auto-Bay_Large.JPG)
Title: Re: ugly ships
Post by: Circlip on August 24, 2013, 05:37:03 pm
Should be green and red with  "Eli Stovebolt" painted down the sides.
 
  Regards  Ian.
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Martin (Admin) on August 24, 2013, 05:39:10 pm
 
.... unless I was thinking of this site: http://uglyships.wordpress.com/
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Martin (Admin) on August 24, 2013, 05:42:38 pm
 
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-u845QdDVBwI/UXLSVtwj71I/AAAAAAAAwLg/M-sX9u_eG_o/s400/DSC01543.JPG)

(http://cf.gcaptain.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/834805-tofi-trimaran.jpg)

(http://i1205.photobucket.com/albums/bb426/michael-taal/1538001.jpg)

(http://uglyships.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/1aai1.jpg)
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Neil on August 24, 2013, 06:03:04 pm
I thought we had a topic for this somewhere...

No.1. UECC Autobay


make a good prison ship would that one.....at least the wheelhouse and bridge have been put at the  right end {-) {-) {-) {-) {-) {-) {-)
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Netleyned on August 24, 2013, 06:14:35 pm
I agree,
but the prisoners welfare would insist on the Epic
shown below.
Prisoners need access to first class recreation
Its their You man rites


Ned
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: eddiesolo on August 24, 2013, 06:28:48 pm
http://uglyships.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/1aai1.jpg


Awe, this ain't ugly just an oddball...poor lickle thing  :((


Si:)
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: eddiesolo on August 24, 2013, 06:30:49 pm
I agree,
but the prisoners welfare would insist on the Epic
shown below.
Prisoners need access to first class recreation
Its their You man rites


Ned


Stuff that get the beggars scrubbing the decks...arghhhhh, Jim lad.




Si:)
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: warspite on August 24, 2013, 09:46:46 pm
looks like the EPIC had a tour party of conservatory reps on holiday the previous month before - gulible captain, lol
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: B.B on August 24, 2013, 10:54:51 pm
A lot of thought went into the design of the tugs w.house probably had an inspiration ( like most people do) while on the throne. :embarrassed: .......
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: BrianB6 on August 25, 2013, 12:04:10 am
Might be worse!
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Neil on August 25, 2013, 12:08:15 am
Might be worse!

beware the redbacks hidin' under the dunny seat {-) {-) {-) {-) {-)
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: eddiesolo on August 25, 2013, 12:12:16 am
Might be worse!


Looks like my modelling shed  {-)


Si:)
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Mad Scientist on August 25, 2013, 02:34:09 am
There's a prison barge near New York City. It has basketball courts on the top at one end; they bear an amazing resemblance to the 'thing' atop Norwegian Epic O0
Tom
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: More Coffee on August 25, 2013, 04:07:51 am
(http://www.tug44.org/tugboats.trawlers/prison-barge-vernon-c-bain/images/prisonbargevernoncbain-1.jpg)
 
http://www.tug44.org/tugboats.trawlers/prison-barge-vernon-c-bain/ (http://www.tug44.org/tugboats.trawlers/prison-barge-vernon-c-bain/)
 
Ugly...most likely not as pretty on the inside either.
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: More Coffee on August 25, 2013, 04:22:43 am
(http://www.shipsnostalgia.com/guides/images/f/f6/C19_Pride_of_al_Salam_95.jpg)
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: superqualicast on September 03, 2013, 10:46:40 am

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-u845QdDVBwI/UXLSVtwj71I/AAAAAAAAwLg/M-sX9u_eG_o/s400/DSC01543.JPG)

(http://cf.gcaptain.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/834805-tofi-trimaran.jpg)

(http://i1205.photobucket.com/albums/bb426/michael-taal/1538001.jpg)

(http://uglyships.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/1aai1.jpg)


Awesome..
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: deadwood on September 27, 2013, 09:12:46 am
Frankly, the pride of God's Own Country has been shaken by a few revelations lately.
But do they need touting for pride with ugly ships to regain it?

ShipSpotting.com (http://www.shipspotting.com/)
(http://cdn2.shipspotting.com/photos/small/7/7/0/1724077.jpg) (http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=1724077)
© tony martin
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: tigertiger on September 27, 2013, 11:32:56 am
I think one of these is the Bibby Venture. AKA coastel 2 (the grey one in the photos) sold to US for a prison ship I believe.


Lived on coastel 2 for 6 months.
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Neil on September 27, 2013, 01:31:53 pm
I think one of these is the Bibby Venture. AKA coastel 2 (the grey one in the photos) sold to US for a prison ship I believe.


Lived on coastel 2 for 6 months.

think that one wins the prize TT.
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: deadwood on September 27, 2013, 02:06:27 pm
I think one of these is the Bibby Venture. AKA coastel 2 (the grey one in the photos) sold to US for a prison ship I believe.

This "ship's" appearance must be part of the punishment for the inmates.
Only the depraved, heinous US justice system can concoct such harsh measures.
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: tigertiger on September 27, 2013, 03:20:04 pm
This "ship's" appearance must be part of the punishment for the inmates.
Only the depraved, heinous US justice system can concoct such harsh measures.


 {-) {-) {-)
These were the main accommodation for the British Army and RAF outside Port Stanley in the Falklands. For several years.
Long before the US got hold.
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Netleyned on September 27, 2013, 05:03:06 pm

 {-) {-) {-)
These were the main accommodation for the British Army and RAF outside Port Stanley in the Falklands. For several years.
Long before the US got hold.

Ask any squaddie or crab who gets treated
best. The US Federal miscreants obviously 

Ned
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Howard Q on September 27, 2013, 10:25:15 pm
Just looking at the small tug, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, everything about this little ship spells devotion to work with a smile, what a superb model it would make, if only you could build in the character element.
Howard Q
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Gumpli on September 28, 2013, 09:38:39 am
Hahaha.Ships here all look strange! ;D
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Mad Scientist on September 29, 2013, 02:37:51 am
WRT that 'skinny' tugboat in Reply # umm 3?
 
The USN has (had?) tugboats with 'bumpers' high up to protect them from the 'overhangs' of various USN CV's .Photos: (http://navyphotos.togetherweserved.com/69085.jpg)
 
and
(http://www.navsource.org/archives/14/140980103.jpg)
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Mad Scientist on September 29, 2013, 02:40:50 am
OOPS, wanted to suggest that that 'skinny' tugboat was designed and built to deal with some sort of 'overhang' issue, like those USN Norfolk tugboats.
 
Tom
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: deadwood on September 29, 2013, 09:45:24 am
Hi Tom,

do you mean those cylindric fenders which can be seen (or rather perceived) at the top edges of the tug's deckhouse on your photo, and which resemble life raft cylinders?

Though I haven't seen fenders positioned that high on a tug yet this would make some sense to me,
especially when one considers the excessive flare that for instance aircraft carriers exhibit at their bow.
That could well explain the necessity for such a narrow superstructure cross-section profile like that of the ridiculed tiny tug.

Regards,
Ralph

Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Netleyned on September 29, 2013, 09:54:37 am
The RN had the Director class paddle tugs built
to move aircraft carriers.

Ned
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Gumpli on September 29, 2013, 10:09:35 am
Beautiful boats.  :-))
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: deadwood on September 29, 2013, 10:19:05 am
Hello Ned,

I think to "move" an aircraft carrier the above tiny tug would be heavily overburdened.
I had more something like a "fastening tug" for just handling the mooring ropes in mind.
I don't know if there is such term like "fastening tug" in English. In German we call those tiny tugs "Festmacherboot".

Regards,
Ralph

Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: deadwood on September 29, 2013, 10:26:59 am
But here's my next entry for the ugly ship award.
Just seen at Shipspotting.com on the entry page.
Though she might have acceptable hull lines
well, this ship doesn't seem to consist of much else than just hull.
Especially when viewed from side like below

ShipSpotting.com (http://www.shipspotting.com/)
(http://cdn2.shipspotting.com/photos/small/8/8/4/1885488.jpg) (http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=1885488)
© lappino
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Netleyned on September 29, 2013, 10:40:37 am
Hi Deadwood.
We have line handling tugs .


One I see nearly every day


http://www.maritimejournal.com/news101/vessel-build-and-maintenance/ship-and-boatbuilding/monogirl_2_takes_on_many_roles (http://www.maritimejournal.com/news101/vessel-build-and-maintenance/ship-and-boatbuilding/monogirl_2_takes_on_many_roles)

Ned
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Navy2000 on September 30, 2013, 12:42:06 am
On the Navy's YTB's they would use up to six of these on a CVN and four on an LHD's and LHA's. They have a 10 - 12 dia prop of them as well. Also the fendering goes all the way down to the keel at the bow as well for working with submarines. The navy still has a few of these tugs around, but some have been replaced with newer tugs with Z-drives. However the Navy has gone to useing more civilian tugs than useing the Naval tugs.


Duane
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Mad Scientist on October 01, 2013, 12:27:08 am
Hi Tom,

do you mean those cylindric fenders which can be seen (or rather perceived) at the top edges of the tug's deckhouse on your photo, and which resemble life raft cylinders?

Though I haven't seen fenders positioned that high on a tug yet this would make some sense to me,
especially when one considers the excessive flare that for instance aircraft carriers exhibit at their bow.
That could well explain the necessity for such a narrow superstructure cross-section profile like that of the ridiculed tiny tug.

Regards,
Ralph

Yes, they were 'fenders/bumpers'. 'Navy 2000' explained it better than I ever could. So be it!
 
Tom
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Mad Scientist on October 01, 2013, 12:30:55 am
Oh, and I found a wonderful candidate at www.shipspotting.com (http://www.shipspotting.com). Hope this works!
ShipSpotting.com (http://www.shipspotting.com/)

© Tom Gulbrandsen

Tom

(http://cdn2.shipspotting.com/photos/middle/6/6/1/1886166.jpg)

(http://cdn2.shipspotting.com/photos/middle/8/6/1/1886168.jpg)

(http://cdn2.shipspotting.com/photos/middle/5/6/1/1886165.jpg)
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Mad Scientist on October 01, 2013, 12:35:07 am
It's listed at 104m long and 70m wide, 9.5m draught..
 
But, seriously, if I was trying to come up with a 'fake' vessel, there's absolutely no way that I could have 'imagineered' this abomination!
 
Tom
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Navy2000 on October 01, 2013, 12:35:48 am
OK


So do you moor it like a normal ship or do you put the stern to the pier.


Duane
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Mad Scientist on October 01, 2013, 12:40:03 am
OK


So do you moor it like a normal ship or do you put the stern to the pier.


Duane

If I knew the answer to your question, I'd be earning large amounts of Great Britain Pounds/U.S. Dollars/Euros advising the owners as to how to maneuver that 'thing'.
 
Tom
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Arrow5 on October 01, 2013, 09:22:59 am
What is this ships` purpose ?   Looks like a vehicle ferry designed for quick loading/unloading.  What is it`s name so we can look it up.  Certainly is an oddity.
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Netleyned on October 01, 2013, 09:36:25 am
Seismic Survey Vessel
Ramform Titan.
Ramform being the hull shape.
Japanese built.

Ned
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Arrow5 on October 01, 2013, 10:50:44 am
Thanks Ned, :-))
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Martin (Admin) on October 01, 2013, 11:42:05 am

On Utube:
http://youtu.be/YhvhP9_E7cM
Title: Re: Just ugly ships
Post by: Stavros on October 01, 2013, 11:57:53 am
u tube
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_wM5njdQU4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_wM5njdQU4)
 
 
Dave
Title: Ugly ships
Post by: Brian60 on November 04, 2014, 07:19:23 am
I couldn't find the original topic, so why not start a new one?

Here's the first contender, please feel free to add your own......
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: derekwarner on November 04, 2014, 07:36:28 am
Have always understood the old nautical term of a G&T ...........not that I drink the said tonic water + Gin spirit

But a similar term could be considered here of .........GT = glass tower?   :o

Derek
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Neil on November 04, 2014, 08:17:32 am
think you get the prize there Brian...........that is UGLY, LOL  %% %% %% %% %%
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Brian60 on November 04, 2014, 08:46:58 am
I don't know what the designer was thinking of. Maybe its one of those river cruise craft on the big european rivers? Like a sea cruise but done on rivers because its cheaper %)
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: TailUK on November 04, 2014, 09:11:38 am
"And with that the Allied Mutual Insurance Company set sail............" 
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Colin Bishop on November 04, 2014, 09:36:43 am
Quote
Maybe its one of those river cruise craft on the big european rivers? Like a sea cruise but done on rivers because its cheaper

Rivers have bridges....
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: McGherkin on November 04, 2014, 12:08:13 pm
"And with that the Allied Mutual Insurance Company set sail............"

Haha! Very good!
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Calimero on November 04, 2014, 12:49:57 pm
The "Sonnenkönigin" looks more like a floating convention center than a ship. And that's what she is as per the web site.
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: NFMike on November 04, 2014, 01:58:30 pm
It would look better if the hull and superstructure were more integrated. As it is it looks like they've plonked a modern building on top of a standard boat hull.
The top is quite elegant in its way.
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Howard on November 04, 2014, 02:07:52 pm
Is it not a barge moving a office block down river.
regards Howard.
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Netleyned on November 04, 2014, 02:13:29 pm
Mayhem's new Gazebo   ;D ;D ;D ;D


Ned
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: BailingBen on January 03, 2015, 07:41:33 pm
this ones pretty ugly...
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: a3nige on January 03, 2015, 07:59:00 pm
Looks like a party ship on Bodensee (lake Constance) Germany.

Quite nice inside, which probably counts more than the outside looks!

http://www.sonnenkoenigin.cc/index.php
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: BailingBen on January 03, 2015, 08:25:19 pm
wouldnt trust it in a gale and abit of sea though  {:-{
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: ian-mccaffrey on January 03, 2015, 08:40:47 pm
not so much ugly ... well not too ugly . but strange looking
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: BailingBen on January 03, 2015, 09:12:55 pm
oil spillage control ship i think
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: ian-mccaffrey on January 03, 2015, 09:18:00 pm
some ugly ones on here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLrRiSqpG-k

Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Neil on January 03, 2015, 09:36:03 pm
this ones pretty ugly...
not ugly, but pure art deco.........a ferry  in North America, the Kalakala is a Motor Vessel. Kalakala was a ferry that operated on Puget Sound from 1935 until her retirement in 1967. MV Kalakala was notable for her unique streamlined superstructure, art deco styling, and luxurious amenities.....she awaits restoration and I believe a preservation order has been put on her.........made of Aluminium superstructure and steel hull, she was way out of anyones league when built in 1935, and a member on here has sights on building her........again in aluminium.

have a look here for images of her......  https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Kalakala&rlz=1T4ADFA_enGB433GB433&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=31-oVO_QEoX5UJWxg7gL&ved=0CDcQsAQ&biw=1152&bih=595
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: ian-mccaffrey on January 03, 2015, 09:47:41 pm
not ugly, but pure art deco.........a ferry  in North America, the Kalakala is a Motor Vessel. Kalakala was a ferry that operated on Puget Sound from 1935 until her retirement in 1967. MV Kalakala was notable for her unique streamlined superstructure, art deco styling, and luxurious amenities.....she awaits restoration and I believe a preservation order has been put on her.........made of Aluminium superstructure and steel hull, she was way out of anyones league when built in 1935, and a member on here has sights on building her........again in aluminium.

have a look here for images of her......  https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Kalakala&rlz=1T4ADFA_enGB433GB433&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=31-oVO_QEoX5UJWxg7gL&ved=0CDcQsAQ&biw=1152&bih=595 (https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Kalakala&rlz=1T4ADFA_enGB433GB433&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=31-oVO_QEoX5UJWxg7gL&ved=0CDcQsAQ&biw=1152&bih=595)


here is a video of her


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw-loco4RIk

Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: BailingBen on January 03, 2015, 09:52:05 pm
wow she actually looked good in her day




its a shame shes abit of a derelict wreck now , atleast shes made of metal and not wood
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: derekwarner on January 03, 2015, 09:52:27 pm
In OZ...we had the movie of the life of Howard Hughes on television two nights ago.......when I saw the image of MV Kalakala .... {-) ...I immediately thought of Mr Hughes

He certainly was a futuristic eccentric...very wealthy man.........& had a string of Hollywood female greats to boot   O0..... Derek
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Mad Scientist on January 03, 2015, 10:49:22 pm
some ugly ones on here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLrRiSqpG-k (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLrRiSqpG-k)

There are two former Northumberland Strait ferries on there - the derelict in the second shot is either Vacationland or Holiday Island. The fifth vessel is Abegweit, as she looked when new.
The ferry service between Cape Tormentine, New Brunswick and Borden, Prince Edward Island was eliminated when the Confederation Bridge was built.

Tom
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: bikerdude999 on January 03, 2015, 11:40:25 pm
this ones pretty ugly...


Has it's own website here, I actually quite like it...


http://www.kalakala.org/
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: essex2visuvesi on January 04, 2015, 12:30:48 am
Me too..... I wonder if there are any plans available for it?
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Umi_Ryuzuki on January 04, 2015, 12:41:38 am
The Kalakala is in a sad state.
The old hull leaks, rusted through in some areas, but only enough to keep the
pumps working 24/7. But in such a state, that the county and coast guard are
worried that it will sink and block the local channel.


There were high hopes when it first returned, in 1998, to Washington State, and the Puget Sound.
However, after years wedged into the Alaskan shore, and buried and used as a processing plant, the
ship had seen better days, and all the fund raising only managed to pay slip fees, and were unable to
fund any of the significant repairs needed to the hull or main deck.


She was sold by her original organization, and moved to her present location where the
Kalakala has continued to deteriorate. Her last owner put her up for sale for $1 USD.
There were rumors of "deals in the works", but nothing has come together for this unique bit
of maritime history.


http://blog.seattlepi.com/thebigblog/2011/12/06/old-kalakala-ferry-up-for-sale-for-just-1/ (http://blog.seattlepi.com/thebigblog/2011/12/06/old-kalakala-ferry-up-for-sale-for-just-1/)


 {:-{


Some Trivia,
The pilot house was so streamlined, that the Skipper could not see the bow of the ship.
There was a small man door in the front main doors so that a deck hand could get out onto
the bow, and direct the docking via a small phone box to one side of the deck superstructure.
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: BailingBen on January 04, 2015, 01:41:07 am
Lord she has to be worth more than 1 usd in scrap surely ?
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: bikerdude999 on January 04, 2015, 01:47:21 am
There's a catch, he won't sell her for scrap, has to be to someone who has the intention/funds to restore her.


Would make a fantastic art deco hotel, or inland cruise ship for long weekends...
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: BailingBen on January 04, 2015, 01:48:23 am
There are loads of things you could do with this ship if you had the money....
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: bikerdude999 on January 04, 2015, 01:51:25 am
If only I won the lottery, and euromillions, then managed to triple my money....
Crew and butler etc living below decks, car deck as my garage, then live above...
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Neil on January 04, 2015, 01:54:28 pm
Did you make the wooden model Umi :-))
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Fastfaz on January 04, 2015, 02:02:16 pm
These ships must have absolutely destroyed the Ugly forest never mind hitting a branch on the ugly tree on the way down! Maybe they are very good and practical at what they were designed for who knows, certainly not pretty.
     Cheers,
        Faz. {:-{
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Umi_Ryuzuki on January 04, 2015, 06:49:40 pm
Did you make the wooden model Umi :-))


Yes, I did. I sent a proposal to the original fund raisers, that I could cast them, and they could
sell them as a way to raise money for restoration. No one ever got back to me. It has since then,
been primed and sanded, and reworked a bit. I may still get around to making a mold and castings.

Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Mad Scientist on January 09, 2015, 10:43:42 pm
It appears that time has finally run out for Kalakala: http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Kalakala-to-be-scrapped-end-of-iconic-Puget-5994668.php

Tom
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Brian60 on April 02, 2015, 09:39:27 pm
Had to resurrect this topic for a truly ugly ship.

This one is for those captains who have yet to grow out of the boy racer image and have rear spoilers on their cars.....
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: adamD98 on April 02, 2015, 11:17:47 pm
It's just missing one of those ridiculous exhausts that tend to shake the street awake at silly o'clock in the morning! (Not my street - I am the law  :police:   {-) ;D )
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: derekwarner on April 02, 2015, 11:47:54 pm
The Princess    :kiss:......looks like she is heading to OZ............... {-).......... Derek
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: warspite on April 03, 2015, 10:21:23 am
I'd like to nominate that 'big fat gypsy wedding carriage' ball that travels over the side of the ship as it plods along, if you want silly gimmicks, then go to Blackpool pleasure beach, don't take them with you on a cruise - which is for relaxation.
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Brian60 on June 26, 2015, 07:55:38 pm
And another contender.

Why do ship designers build such ugly monstrosities? Its no good saying its a 'green' ship that to me is a cop out.
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Umi_Ryuzuki on June 26, 2015, 08:06:21 pm
No excuse for that bow, I imagine it is a wave piercing design.
But the stern deck is "engineering utility".

The ship is designed to uncoil cable from its deck and lay it to the bottom of the sea.


"World Diamond"  has a similar "off" bow design, and I have seen plans for modeling it.
 %)
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Martin (Admin) on July 01, 2015, 05:26:03 pm

 EDVIN OLAI Mosvollbukta, Oernes


http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/details/ships/shipid:312125/mmsi:258544000/imo:0/vessel:EDVIN_OLAI

(http://u.cubeupload.com/Mayhem1/kjXVvE.jpg)

(http://u.cubeupload.com/Mayhem1/L8Wpe6.jpg)
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: DavieTait on July 01, 2015, 05:56:26 pm
supermodel looks compared to the Northern Lights LT1004 Martin , often called the "OXO boat" or "Rubics Cube" she was built in the early 90's under a loophole in the fishing regulations at the Faroes meaning any UK boat with an overall length less than 10m could fish unrestricted...

That meant a boat 9.98m x 9.98m x 9.98m , powered by 2 Gardner 8LXB engines ( 240hp each , she could only do about 7 knots ) , the fish got vertigo and altitude sickness before being put on the deck, unsurprisingly NOT a success and she eventually ended up in MacDuff where they stripped her out and removed the wheelhouse and converted her into a Salmon farm feed barge ( my cousin towed her up to the Shetlands and he said it was the worst job he ever took..... ) , she sunk a couple of years ago got raised and chopped up

Oh and those bars and heavy metal extensions on the "bow" and "stern" were put on to try and make its sea keeping viable...

(http://trawlerphotos.co.uk/gallery/data/1203/medium/rubic_cube_009.jpg)
(http://trawlerphotos.co.uk/gallery/data/1203/medium/rubic_cube_007.jpg)
(http://trawlerphotos.co.uk/gallery/data/1203/medium/DSCF0633.JPG)
(http://trawlerphotos.co.uk/gallery/data/505/medium/boat060.jpg)
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Brian60 on July 01, 2015, 06:50:44 pm
That boat Martin seems as though it started life as one design and ended up with 3 others tacked on for good luck.
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: mrturbo553 on July 01, 2015, 09:55:02 pm
Davie , have you any idea when the photos were taken as it looks suspiciously like my home town  :-))
Aid

Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: DavieTait on July 01, 2015, 10:04:46 pm
Photos taken in Scarborough Aid as to year there's nothing on the photos to say but early to mid 90's I'd think
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: ballastanksian on July 01, 2015, 10:12:42 pm
this ones pretty ugly...

Someone put a fifties Diner on a hull and thought it would be novel. They would have to serve their sundaes and malted milks in dishes rather than those tallboy glasses (sic)
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: warspite on July 02, 2015, 12:32:25 pm
Looks like a motorflote to me  %)
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Brian60 on July 20, 2015, 02:19:45 pm
And another one to add to the list. Why design a ship like this? the planners must be on acid...........

Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: warspite on July 20, 2015, 02:29:10 pm
If it were the caption competion,
Hey captain - that was great avioding action you took back their, still dont know what that bump was though
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Umi_Ryuzuki on July 20, 2015, 09:27:28 pm
It is a seismic survey ship.
They tow an array of cables branching out from the stern of the ship, and
stretching out to almost 8 kilometer behind the vessel.
The wide transom allows them to achieve a better spread of the sensors.


(http://pge.com/includes/images/shared/edusafety/dcpp/seismic/seismic_survey_2_web.png)
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: DavieTait on July 21, 2015, 06:42:19 pm
I believe they can tow over 20 cables meaning they can do the work of around 3 ships with just one , ugly looking thing and I wouldn't want to be on it in poor weather she must have a very unusual and uncomfortable motion in heavy seas

She is a ramform type hull

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Ramform+Titan&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0CCgQsARqFQoTCK_e-N7h7MYCFeSu2wodnu8CUg&biw=1024&bih=608 (https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Ramform+Titan&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0CCgQsARqFQoTCK_e-N7h7MYCFeSu2wodnu8CUg&biw=1024&bih=608)

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Ramform+hull&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0CCEQsARqFQoTCLyOhJXi7MYCFYNp2wodofAAUQ (https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Ramform+hull&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0CCEQsARqFQoTCLyOhJXi7MYCFYNp2wodofAAUQ)

http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=x-raw-image:///0cadf002216fca929f48a1a5223e17457d4830938f00268d5e51b890f597ae01&imgrefurl=http://www.pgs.com/upload/201772/techlink46_ramform%2520sovereign_web.pdf&h=728&w=514&tbnid=kspvIQLwrQxTFM:&docid=3I88FObF_iv5dM&ei=0YOuVd3REOHd7Qbi6rDQCg&tbm=isch&ved=0CIEBEDMoVzBXahUKEwid_v-W4uzGAhXhbtsKHWI1DKo (http://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=x-raw-image:///0cadf002216fca929f48a1a5223e17457d4830938f00268d5e51b890f597ae01&imgrefurl=http://www.pgs.com/upload/201772/techlink46_ramform%2520sovereign_web.pdf&h=728&w=514&tbnid=kspvIQLwrQxTFM:&docid=3I88FObF_iv5dM&ei=0YOuVd3REOHd7Qbi6rDQCg&tbm=isch&ved=0CIEBEDMoVzBXahUKEwid_v-W4uzGAhXhbtsKHWI1DKo)

(http://www.ship-info.com/Vessels/796.jpg)
Title: Re: Ugly ships
Post by: Perkasaman2 on July 21, 2015, 08:28:43 pm
I seem to remember that an iclandic gun boat operated during the Cod War  had a similar hull form. Our Leanders had a tough time and their traditional slender hulls really suffered in those stormy northern waters.
Title: UGLY!!!
Post by: Brian60 on February 17, 2016, 07:38:42 pm
Are  these the ugliest tugs you ever clapped eyes on? Noisy as Hell as well, I can't believe the noise they make, there's hope for noise generators yet. It also has some nice footage of not only the tow of a longboat, but the Humber keelboat puts in an appearance and several other craft as well.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osLmi7Kff_0&list=PLCFwxS32BgaQxiwwMQVfC2wk057u2lon4
Title: Re: UGLY!!!
Post by: Robotnik on February 17, 2016, 08:59:54 pm
They sound a bit like a train, are they diesel-electric?
Title: Re: UGLY!!!
Post by: ballastanksian on February 17, 2016, 09:23:17 pm
Except no one put oil in the engines:O)

They look no more or less ugly than modern tugs. They are not that busy up top and are at least quite tidy. Perhaps spartan is a better description for them? When I read 'Dean's'. I was expecting to see a model boat being rescued by a model tug from the well known model manufacturer, not a Tug company %) :}
Title: Re: UGLY!!!
Post by: tugmad on February 17, 2016, 09:59:23 pm
They were built on the river Medway for Crescent Shipping, to tow / push the lash barges from the Thames to the Medway and back.
Title: Re: UGLY!!!
Post by: Brian60 on February 18, 2016, 05:49:06 am
They were built on the river Medway for Crescent Shipping, to tow / push the lash barges from the Thames to the Medway and back.

Thanks for the info tugmad. I wonder how they got up as far as the Humber? Mind you for pushing barges they are in the ideal environment here. There are hundreds of barges need moving around the Humber ports all the way up past Goole to the inland waterways.

They sound a bit like a train, are they diesel-electric?


That's what I found strange now you mention it. They sounded nothing like anything I've seen on water before. They do sound like old diesel trains of the Deltic variety.
Title: Re: UGLY!!!
Post by: tugmad on February 18, 2016, 08:16:05 am
Hi Brian, when built they had 2 x6 cyl caterpillar engines driving schottel units and were later re fitted with two Volvo Penta engines of 550 hp each,definitely not Diesel electric,perhaps it is just bad silencing. Geo
Title: Re: UGLY!!!
Post by: david48 on February 18, 2016, 05:28:00 pm
I've just watched the video with the sound this time , I think the engine sound is the narrow boat engine , sounds a bit like an old Lister or a Beta . The shot of the two tugs/ pushers from a distance the engine can still be heard as loud .
David


Title: Re: UGLY!!!
Post by: Captain fizz on February 19, 2016, 07:18:59 pm
Really not sure what engine that is. It's not a Lister.
Serious bit of rope around the prop though.
Title: Re: UGLY!!!
Post by: Martin (Admin) on February 19, 2016, 08:48:34 pm

Shovette & Lashette
   {-) {-)

( Merged in a couple old topics )
Title: Re: Ugly ships !
Post by: Brian60 on March 03, 2016, 07:04:42 pm
Don't know about ugly but certainly one of the strangest ships I've seen. It's obviously a drill ship/production platform but heck.......

from 1m 50secs into the video you get better shots of it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9mJLlNr3Hc
Title: Re: Ugly ships !
Post by: Nemo on March 03, 2016, 08:09:16 pm
Where is it's bridge I wonder?   %)
Title: Re: Ugly ships !
Post by: deadwood on March 03, 2016, 09:56:09 pm
The same question came immediately to my mind.

I guess that there must be installed a new navigation bridge somewhere on the jib with the turret
because I cannot imagine that from the former bridge located on the aft deck house of the ex-tanker anything ahead of the vessel could be seen,
since the turret must completely obstruct the sight.
Or they navigate by camera.
Title: Re: Ugly ships !
Post by: warspite on March 04, 2016, 07:12:57 pm
If for instance you watch the massive ships series on Quest - they covered a FSPO, though that one wasn't powered, once in position it floated around the fixed bouy it was connected to, no engine as it wasn't required, this one on the other hand is powered, I suspect though the bridge is still used in the conventional way and they probably use radar primarily, when they get to any shipping lanes they probably deploy staff to keep watch up forward with radios other wise when in normal operation it probably has to move around the Ghanan oil field every couple of years, and as the suez takes most traffic they probably won't be that close to the west African shipping lanes and therefore not in the way. just a thought