Hi Rick - thanks for the full image of the ship, and apologies for my delay in replying. I've got so much on.
I took a good look at the image on Friday and it seems clear that the forward frames (seen in the profile) are three feet apart, the centre section four feet, and the stern section three feet. With a couple of feet "bodge" to the centre of the rudder shaft from the last obvious frame, I calculated the between perpendiculars distance to be 380 feet, based on the numbers of three and four foot spaces from the waterline afterwards to the rudder shafts, as fits the class.
The frame drawn nearest the bow should be frame "0", and I can get the forward sections to fit ok up to the front of the boiler room. At the stern, assuming section 165 is at or in front of the A frames this also makes sense for a few of the frames moving forward. However, the middle sections seem, at times, to be misnumbered - there's no obvious way to locate all these to the frames drawn. (And bearing in mind that - on the Dreadnought at least - the sections of four foot frame spacing count as "2" in terms of section numbers).
So - I don't get it.
The solution - short of buying NMM plans for the class! - I'd draw out, at the desired scale, an elevation and plan for the hull, using the measurements you know, along with the three-foot/four-foot frame spacing you can infer from the small plan you have, to ensure components end up in the place they must have been when the ship was constructed. I'd scale up to this size the sections you have, and fit them where they match the plan and elevation. Use these to construct waterlines on the plan, and once that's done, then you'd be able to mark (and make) bulkheads/frames wherever you wish, with a fair assertion that the hull form was a reasonable one.
Andy