Hi one blade missing. You are of course right about the lowest common denominator, I know all about them, I'm a teacher of design and technology.
We have the ridiculous situation which says we must teach modern techniques and processes as used in industry. They then have to produce a product for their GCSE, usually wood based, in a workshop. Now here's the rub. They are not allowed to use power tools until they are 16 or over, and strictly speaking that includes a cordless drill, or orbital sander. Now don't get me wrong, I'm all for the use of hand tools and traditional methods, in their place, but what about industry. The kid leaves school, and gets a job in a wood shop, and he/she's never even picked up a jigsaw, let alone a router, or power plane. Scary!
The same could be said of models, though despite all I have said above, I would hesitate in letting my 12 year old too near my running airboat. Let alone allow him try to start it or adjust the mixture etc. Double standards perhaps? But there were kids at a private school I used to teach at who I would allow to use the bandsaw, linisher, and so on. By the same token there were others in the same school I would hesitate to allow into the workshop. It all comes down to the individual, and the judgement of a responsible person. It is that judgement that this "nanny" state is removing and TRYING to replace with legislation, and all because of the litigious blame culture we seem to have imported from across the pond. Has no one got the courage to take a calculated risk any more. The scouts are not even allowed to play British bulldog any more!
But back to the important issues in life. Airboats. I am assuming these tethered airboats follow the general three point arrangement of most other tethered hydros. what I am wondering though is; how does the torque reaction of a large spinning prop, and the top heavy nature of an airboat with its engine in the air affect the stability. Or is it bridled in such a way as to prevent it from falling over?