Model Boat Mayhem

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length.
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: First evidence of a time traveller?  (Read 4529 times)

justboatonic

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,515
  • Location: Thornton Cleveleys
First evidence of a time traveller?
« on: October 28, 2010, 07:23:02 pm »

Dont know if anyone else has seen this. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/8093870/Charlie-Chaplin-time-traveller.html

It concerns a clip of a 'woman' in a film clip talking into what some have said is a mobile phone. Nothing suspicious about that. Well, except the film is a clip from a Charlie Chaplin 1928 film! And, the 'woman' looks like a man in drag!

This has never been spotted before but the guy who did notice it says he doesnt know if its true or not.

Another link

http://blogs.babble.com/famecrawler/2010/10/28/charlie-chaplin-time-traveler-why-wasnt-this-noticed-earlier-three-theories/
Logged

Lord Bungle

  • Guest
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2010, 10:25:44 pm »

No great expert here, but a little thing to ponder, as mobile phones need satellites to work who was the person talking to? In the 20's we didn't even have a space race on this planet, so how did the satellites get there?
Logged

meyer

  • Guest
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2010, 10:30:03 pm »

Do mobiles need satellites ? I thought they ran off repeater masts, Im sitting here looking across to a vodaphone repeater mast
Logged

justboatonic

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,515
  • Location: Thornton Cleveleys
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2010, 11:23:23 pm »

Well regarding phone masts or satellites etc and, ignoring for a moment the need for a 'time machine' to exist prior to the time you want to travel to ie if this were an example of a time traveller, the time machine would have to have been built no later than 1928 so, are the travellers ET's, there are a couple of options

1, the people who solved the time travel conumdrum also solved the ability to communicate across time or

2, the communication device the 'traveller' was talking into wasnt a mobi but another device for communication or

3, the person the supposed time traveller was talking too wasnt that far away so negated the need for a relay mast of satellite.
Logged

ZZ56

  • Guest
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2010, 11:55:49 pm »

or 4.  people are seeing what they want into a grainy seconds-long videoclip from 1928 featuring a person with their hand up to their ear. 
Logged

justboatonic

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,515
  • Location: Thornton Cleveleys
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2010, 12:22:38 am »

or 4.  people are seeing what they want into a grainy seconds-long videoclip from 1928 featuring a person with their hand up to their ear. 

Could be. Who knows?
Logged

Boy From the Bay

  • Guest
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2010, 12:58:16 am »

No.

Its an early tranny.
Transistor radio that is.  :embarrassed:
Logged

Lord Bungle

  • Guest
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2010, 01:14:03 am »

could also be someone who had gone for a walk from the HUG ME clinic in lala town  {-)
Logged

malcolmfrary

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,788
  • Location: Blackpool, Lancs, UK
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2010, 10:01:02 am »

Just some old biddy with either earache or a loose hat, or both.  Maybe a wobbly wig.  That and someone deciding he was 8 and a half minutes short on his 15 minutes worth of fame.
Logged
"With the right tool, you can break anything" - Garfield

Lord Bungle

  • Guest
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #9 on: October 29, 2010, 10:05:59 am »

Just some old biddy with either earache or a loose hat, or both.  Maybe a wobbly wig.  That and someone deciding he was 8 and a half minutes short on his 15 minutes worth of fame.
{-)

and everyone knows real time travellers only travel in a blue police phone box  {-)
Logged

Bunkerbarge

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,370
  • Location: Halifax, UK
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2010, 10:08:12 am »

{-)

and everyone knows real time travellers only travel in a blue police phone box  {-)


.........with a robot dog.
Logged
"Dirty British coaster with a salt-caked smoke stack, Butting through the Channel in the mad March days"

Mankster

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 770
  • Wheelerdealer
  • Location: London, UK
    • RC Model Submarines
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2010, 10:14:43 am »

Or just hiding his/her face and saying "Stop pointing that camera at me, I dont want anyone to see me in these clothes..."

joppyuk

  • Guest
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2010, 10:22:15 am »

or - posh person ashamed to be seen going into the cimema (and Charlie Chaplin film at that), with hat pulled down, collar turned up, holding purse/clutch bag in front of face to hide from camera. Time travel is alledgedly possible, but unlikely, otherwise why are people not popping up all over the place. Think of the research possibilities - real-time drawings and photos of every detail of the ship your modelling. No more of that "couldn't have that shape/colour/whatever at that date".
Logged

Sub driver

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 607
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2010, 10:38:37 am »

How do you know that they were not talking into a comminicator back to their space ship in orbit of the planet !  ok2

sub.
Logged

justboatonic

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,515
  • Location: Thornton Cleveleys
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2010, 10:40:22 am »

Just some old biddy with either earache or a loose hat, or both.  Maybe a wobbly wig.  That and someone deciding he was 8 and a half minutes short on his 15 minutes worth of fame.

Oooh you cynic!  ok2
Logged

malcolmfrary

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,788
  • Location: Blackpool, Lancs, UK
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #15 on: October 29, 2010, 03:04:44 pm »

Logged
"With the right tool, you can break anything" - Garfield

HS93 (RIP)

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,949
  • I cannot spell , tough
  • Location: Rainhill UK
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #16 on: October 29, 2010, 05:16:41 pm »

There must be time travel, if not how would Martin get his shirts from the set of Hawaiian   Five   O   {-)

Peter

 O0
Logged

Wasyl

  • Guest
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #17 on: October 29, 2010, 05:42:30 pm »

Oxfam,s more likely,

Wullie
Logged

Netleyned

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8,984
  • Location: Meridian Line, Mouth of the Humber
    • cleethorpes mba
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #18 on: October 29, 2010, 05:48:54 pm »

Danno has passed on

RIP

Ned
Logged
Smooth seas never made skilful sailors
Up Spirits  Stand fast the Holy Ghost.
http://www.cleethorpesmba.co.uk/

malcolmfrary

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,788
  • Location: Blackpool, Lancs, UK
Logged
"With the right tool, you can break anything" - Garfield

HS93 (RIP)

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,949
  • I cannot spell , tough
  • Location: Rainhill UK
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #20 on: October 30, 2010, 12:57:56 pm »

Further time travel "evidence"
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/science-%26-technology/kfc-spotted-in-corner-of-'the-hay-wain'-201010293207/

Ah another reader of a good news source. %%

I take it you also read  http://www.b3ta.com/   ( not for the under 16s or old narks)

Peter
Logged

bbjs

  • Guest
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #21 on: October 30, 2010, 01:18:34 pm »

LOL...

As proposed around the globe.
Here's for the time travelling drag-lady:

http://hearing.siemens.com/en/10-about-us/01-our-h istory/milestones.jsp?page=3&year=1924

http://www.hearingaidmuseum.com/gallery/Carbon/WesternElectric/info/westelect34a.htm

Cheers, Bjorn
Logged

garston1

  • Guest
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #22 on: October 31, 2010, 10:45:08 pm »

Surely people from the future know about this piece of film. All they would have to do is travel back to before the film was made and make sure that said Ladyboy doesn't get into shot!
Logged

DARLEK1

  • Guest
Re: First evidence of a time traveller?
« Reply #23 on: October 31, 2010, 10:49:14 pm »

Took 4 hours for the curry I had last night to re appear and kept me up all night afterwards, human digestive system I always thought was seven hours?  %)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up