Model Boat Mayhem

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length.
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: noob question  (Read 2458 times)

simmer1470

  • Guest
noob question
« on: March 24, 2011, 10:47:48 am »

sorry to ask such a simple question but would a 540 style motor be suitable for a 5ft long mono hull boat or would it need to be geared or just have a bigger motor
i dont want a fast speed boat just a moderate speeder

any help welcomed
Logged

essex2visuvesi

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 6,148
  • Location: Finland, England, Finland!
Re: noob question
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2011, 10:48:53 am »

Possibly but I would think a brushless would be a better bet
Logged
One By One The Penguins Steal My Sanity
Proud member of the OAM  (Order of the Armchair Modeller)
Junior member of the OGG  (Order of the Grumpy Git)

grasshopper

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 773
  • Location: Lincolnshire!
    • A1 Hobbies Ltd.
Re: noob question
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2011, 11:52:18 am »

It would really depend on the type of 5' 'mono' hull we're looking at....if it was long and thin like a warship then possibly, if it's a tug type hull it would probably struggle, if a speed boat or launch then definitely a problem. A little more info or picture would help the situation.

Logged

simmer1470

  • Guest
Re: noob question
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2011, 12:23:28 pm »



its 5ft long 17inch wide


the red prop and shaft came with the boat but are siezed
 ive got a new  black prop (50X M5) and shaft (BALLRACE PROPSHAFT M5 5mm 9")
Logged

grasshopper

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 773
  • Location: Lincolnshire!
    • A1 Hobbies Ltd.
Re: noob question
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2011, 12:32:55 pm »

As regards the 540 option....Forget it!

To make a 540 do anything half-way decent in a hull like that, you'd have to run it at high voltage and then gear down to give it enough torgue to turn that prop.
A 700  (9.6v) or 850 (or even better -  twin's)  would be a reasonable start on 12v - but that looks an awfully heavy hull and superstructure.

Essex2's suggestion of brushless would be worth investigating - even for moderate speed, with modern batteries you could get it to perform well. What sort of budget are you considering?
Logged

simmer1470

  • Guest
Re: noob question
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2011, 01:13:31 pm »

the hull and top decks are both thick fibre glass

the twin idea is some think ive been looking at
 the under side is like this


could possible to have a twin set up i think but would it still need bigger motors or what size brushless motors

Logged

TomTheKraut

  • Guest
Re: noob question
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2011, 01:34:18 pm »

Hi there,
... in this hull, a twin-setup of 2x 700 9,6V brushed motors on 3S or 4S LiPo or 4S LiFePo should produce the sort of speed which is just that bit over "scale speed" to make it fun on the pond. Plus, it's a relatively cost effective solution.

If it were my boat and I'd go for single and brushless, I'd look for an outrunner, capable of handling about about 18V and producing about 1000 rpm/V under load (if only unloaded figures can be given by the manufacturer, look for around 1300 rpm/V). Then run this motor with 4S LiPo or 4S LiFePo.
Logged

simmer1470

  • Guest
Re: noob question
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2011, 04:59:24 pm »

So something like this off ebay 250793170252
Logged

pompebled

  • Full Mayhemer
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 588
  • Location: Sneek, Netherlands
Re: noob question
« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2011, 06:10:48 pm »

Logged
Boaters are nice people

BJ

  • Guest
Re: noob question
« Reply #9 on: April 01, 2011, 05:03:53 pm »

sorry to ask such a simple question but would a 540 style motor be suitable for a 5ft long mono hull boat or would it need to be geared or just have a bigger motor
i dont want a fast speed boat just a moderate speeder

any help welc/quote]

Once again, the (old) Prop Shop bible....
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.113 seconds with 21 queries.