I have to agree RAAArty, it's called being 'Professionally Offended', sadly all too common these days. 'I am not affected in any way, but if I was, I might be upset, so I will write lots of angry letters telling you how upset I might possibly have been if I was in that position'. However, I digress so I'll draw a line under it. Literally.
It's a very conclusive development that's been announced today (if it is true), that the autopilot was set to take the plane off course, BEFORE the communications were lost. Surely if something was amiss in the cockpit, the crew wouldn't continue acting as normal. It's very suspicious, and again points to a deliberate diversion by the crew. Even if the copilot wasn't 'in on it', surely he'd have seen the pilot reprogramming the computer? But then were they acting of their own accord or did they have someone holding a gun to their heads?
And furthermore why? Was the motive people, property, or plane? I think it'll be a long time before we know the answer to those questions. We'll find out where it came down and why first, then we'll have to work out how it got there.