It can be difficiult to compare apples with apples
Just looking at 5" Gauge scale steam locomotive engines, we have the weight of the engine [100-150 kg] on the track, so when the steam regulator is opened [gradually], the valving [Stephenson, Hackworth etc] will admit steam at boiler pressure to the cylinders to provide work.....so the difference here essentially is the load upon the engine/system which allows a relatively smooth acceleration [if not spinning the wheels]The simple steam valves employed on model boat steam engines in most cases is little better than a 'stop type plug valve with on/off' performance, but with little progressive volume of steam to the engine to apply the required effort/inertia to rotate the paddle shaft & propeller
Having a little knowledge of full sized steam and fluid systems valving as used in the Steel Industry, in 2005, I purchased a radio control model steam regulator from ACS Engineering Scotland [Sandy Campbell] - a properly designed balanced, spring loaded, self regulating, disk valve construction component ....it is literally a 3/4" cube of bronze+bronze with stainless trim - [at the time of purchase probably twice the cost of el'cheapo alternate valving which had no credential of design and regulating capacity]
The valve performs exactly as described when supplied with 2 Bar lubricated steam ....[worth every penny an more
]
I will describe the engine detail later........The Saito T2DR [12x12] test you show is absolutely typical of this Brand in Videos on the Net, where the engine will tick over relatively smoothly between directions and at
low speed, which also suggests a lower pressure applied to the engine. This also suggests it is OK to swap engine drive directions in the model at speed. I am not suggesting for one moment that the Saito product has poor manufacturing tolerances to enable smooth operation [from unused, or not requiring a run-in period
The
Graham Industries TVR1ABB in your video clearly required a higher air pressure & hence higher speed to achieve a direction reversalThe only engine I have is also a Saito, but the Y2DR horizontal twin [1960 design vintage and 12x20], also near mirrors the unloaded reversing functionality at low speed you show.
This engine also has some 1.8kg of mass to rotate [engine flywheels +1/4" diameter brass paddle shaft + 160 diameter brass paddle wheels] The Y2DR & drive with the paddles in water with 2 Bar boiler pressure available, will slowly commence engine rotation of the wheels slowly without any real jerkiness - an
ACTion electronics P96 controller is installed to both engine reversal of direction lever and the ASC steam regulator.....both shown in the second image
[I apologise no videos to support this]
My conclusion to this issue of non start from Zero speed, or jerkiness is the inherent distribution of the steam within the engine, irrespective of differing design valving, and often compounded by the choice of ineffective design external steam regulating valving and an unloaded function at commencement of workComparison testing of steam engines on air is if by necessity is a good yardstick, however the same engines may display differing actions, timing or speeds when tested on steam
To compound a conflicting to my thoughts, I am happy to say it's OK to throw an electric motor drive from full ahead to full astern in one movement [without considering a cessation of rotation in the middle], however have certain fear and reservation in ordering the same command for my steam engine
[The only reference for this are comments & advice offered by an elderly Steam Engineer, was that repeated at speed reversals [marine steam engine] resulted in expansion-deformation of an eccentric
link outer band, to the degree that correct valve timing is lost - the steam still expanding, with so much potential and kinetic energy that must be absorbed, so by design was preferable for a bronze band to deform [go egg shape] than a crankshaft journal shear ]
Derek