Thanks guys.
That seems to mesh with how I understood it.
It gets complicated because there is more than one thing being assessed.
As I understand it:
1. Scale - how near to a replica of a real ship it is.
2. Realism - how accurate is the detail, i.e. how realistic it looks
3. Build type - was it scratch-built or a kit. (i.e. effort involved in the build)
I see the three as a kind of spectrum of 'ethics'.
The very 'best' possible would be a scratch-built, highly detailed true scale replica of a real ship.
The 'least' would be a kit-built (or RTR!), low detailed 'freelance' design, not based on an actual type.
That's not to say that each type doesn't have their place.
It gets complicated when a model does 'well' in one area but not another.
e.g. a stand-off scale model of a real ship...
or a highly detailed, realistic 'freelance' model.
My model will hopefully look very realistic and is a 'scatch-build' (I'm drawing the lines plan!) but as it's not a replica or even a example of a specific type (looe lugger, macerel driver, fifie) then it's not actually a 'scale' model at all!
