Even the late Brian King embraced 'modern' technology in his scratch built models - I am sure I read in one of his books how he designed and had etched a brass filigree detail for one of his Victorian battleships - which obviously won some awards.....
As for 3D printing being or not being considered a part of scratch building, I would fall on the side of it BEING so. When designing our first kit, the Free Enterprise ferry, I took the early decision to embrace the 3D print concept for the majority of the fittings to enable some extremely fine detail to be produced at 1:96 - an example being this winch:
And all this foredeck detail:
Now, some of this could be moulded and resin cast....but the winch most certainly cannot.
Is it scratch built? Not when it is used as a part of the kit, but when I produced the prototype model then, yes, I considered it to be scratch built. The design of the winch on the computer took me the best part of 50 hours. I, personally, don't have the skill to make something like this by hand, but I have the skill and thought processes to design it in the computer for the machine to print it out. Much like a skilled person on a lathe has to think through what he is doing to produce the individual parts and then assemble them.
Personally, I think 3D printing IS the future for the detail parts of our hobby. There will always be those with the skill to craft by hand but, unfortunately, their number is decreasing. The advantages of 3D printing over whitemetal casting include weight saving and increased possibility of detail. The disadvantage at the moment is cost - there is over £125 worth of 3D fittings in each of our FEV ferry kits...a quite considerable proportion of the kit cost.....but I feel this is justified by the better detail, accuracy and strength of the fittings.
Anyone fancy having a go at scratch building this?
Every seat identical...........................
Pip pip!!!
Carl